Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SFI\s+45\.1\s+Padding\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SFI\s+45\.1\s+Padding\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: SFI 45.1 Padding (score: 1): Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 06:12:08 -0800; I am planning on using the 45.1 stuff "in the proximity of the helmet" as specified and I'll use the other stuff around the rest of the roll cage. I am assuming that is acceptable. Ken, I'm not 100%; /html/land-speed/2001-03/msg00000.html (6,498 bytes)
2. SFI 45.1 Padding (score: 1): Author: Ken Bond <kmb2@humboldt.edu>; Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 07:51:21 -0800; I got a question about roll-cage padding.. Rule III-3.1 states padding "meeting" SFI 45.1 That clear. I bought some from JEGS the other day and it is good looking stuff... but a friend who races SCCA; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg01058.html (8,168 bytes)
3. Re: SFI 45.1 Padding (score: 1): Author: "glen barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:06:23 -0800; Stick with the SFI 45.1 padding, there is no question in inspection. Remember it's the car owners burden of proof on any thing like this. Glen -- Original Message -- From: "Ken Bond" <kmb2@humboldt.; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg01060.html (9,046 bytes)
4. Re: SFI 45.1 Padding (score: 1): Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:46:10 -0800; His stuff clearly appears to be the same product. When a rule such as III 3.1 states a need to "meet" a standard, does the product have to be stamped with a certification or can it meet the standard; /html/land-speed/2001-02/msg01101.html (7,075 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]