- 1. SCTA etc (score: 1)
- Author: M Pittwood <MPittwood@compuserve.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 07:21:16 -0500
- My lastnight response seems to have been too large, or I left the trailer, and has not got through. The final point was in fact a question:- "Would the SCTA/BNI sanction World Records for ALL types
- /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00386.html (6,826 bytes)
- 2. RE: SCTA etc (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:01:16 -0500
- I think if the FIA had a group in the USA that supported LSR the way they do other venues this would not be much of a discussion. On top of that if the records were treated as though they were import
- /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00387.html (8,836 bytes)
- 3. Re: SCTA etc (score: 1)
- Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 07:02:13 -0600
- Malcolm that's where we got to last time as I recall... that we needed a seperate organization that was simply the holder of the overall WORLD records.... this would assimiluate all the record books
- /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00388.html (7,490 bytes)
- 4. Re: SCTA etc (score: 1)
- Author: Nt788@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:55:59 EST
- Malcolm I think FIA is absolutly necessary, for freedom of design, I think SCTA is necessary for a prompt accurate honest local place to set records! I will call my records anything I want. We the pe
- /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00395.html (7,007 bytes)
- 5. Re: SCTA etc (score: 1)
- Author: Bryan Savage <b.a.savage@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:10:41 -0800
- In my 4 visits to Black Rock in 1997 I met two different Americans who were not FIA employees but were "FIA representatives". Is there some reason that SCTA/BNI could not operate Internationally the
- /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00400.html (7,245 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu