Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fuel\s+Injection\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fuel\s+Injection\s+Question\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: Joel Wolcott <wolcott_jl@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 07:16:22 -0700 (PDT); Here is a broad question which i am sure will elicit more questions from the knowledgeable audience. My application is a 4 cylinder with no boost, this just in case it makes a difference. What are th; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00248.html (7,677 bytes)
2. Re: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: ardunbill@webtv.net; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 11:01:53 -0400; Individual throttle bodies are always an advantage because they insure equal distribution of fuel to each cylinder. There is always some inequality of distribution in a plenum. Theoretically having t; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00249.html (7,912 bytes)
3. RE: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: "Jonathan Amo" <jonamo@landracing.com>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 09:14:02 -0600; Really, I thought the best place to have the injector was right behind the intake valve.... Jon Individual throttle bodies are always an advantage because they insure equal distribution of fuel to ea; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00251.html (8,515 bytes)
4. RE: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: "Jonathan Amo" <jonamo@landracing.com>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 09:16:51 -0600; My thinking on this is having the injector close to intake valve, in another email Bill H was saying this can cause unburned fuel to come out exhaust, well this is true if you are running rich, I sti; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00252.html (8,715 bytes)
5. Re: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: "Benn" <karhu@california.com>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 09:14:08 -0700; 1. I don't see how having unburned fuel exit the exhaust is a problem per se in a B'ville vehicle. 2. The further upstream the injection occurs, the more chance for the fuel to evaporate and mix, but; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00253.html (9,762 bytes)
6. Re: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 12:32:19 EDT; Who's theory is that? Is that why many racers use "down-nozzles" and other forms of port nozzles placing the nozzle as close to the intake valve as possible? How do you account for (-A) aerated nozzl; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00254.html (8,585 bytes)
7. Re: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: Joel Wolcott <wolcott_jl@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 09:32:33 -0700 (PDT); Would be timing the injectors with aftermarket ecu - Trying to decide on intake options at the moment - Motor is a VW 16V. I have a european intake that is a bit larger then standard, I can keep the; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00255.html (8,506 bytes)
8. Re: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: "John Burk" <joyseydevil@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 12:39:21 -0400; The CFM through a port is higher for dry air than with a fuel air mix . The lower the nozzle the better . John Burk joyseydevil@comcast.net; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00256.html (8,179 bytes)
9. RE: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: jthorn65@sbcglobal.net; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 13:07:25 -0500; It generally is. This gives the atomized fuel less time to form larger droplets or coat the walls of the intake. It also serves to cool the intake valve which usually has less provision for cooling t; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00258.html (9,516 bytes)
10. Re: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: "todd" <todd@twinjugs.com>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 19:45:20 +0000; Wow, there's something I would of never considered or even thought of. Best reason I've ever heard of next to the normal(normal for many anyway), thoughts that the longer the distance the atomized fu; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00259.html (8,613 bytes)
11. Re: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: Bryan Savage <b.a.savage@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 14:01:11 -0700; Interesting question. For most automotive stock based N/A engines running gas, I don't think it makes much difference. Dave D. says high fuel pressure will help which makes a lot of sense. At extreme; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00260.html (9,215 bytes)
12. Re: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: Joel Wolcott <wolcott_jl@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 14:46:02 -0700 (PDT); /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00261.html (8,682 bytes)
13. Re: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 17:04:25 -0700; In my very limited experience a set of injectors I made with the nozzles pointing right at the intake valves, the engine was a dog on gas, but ran well on alcohol. I have been told that down nozzles; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00262.html (9,482 bytes)
14. RE: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 20:36:20 -0400; You have no clue.. Follow F1 technology and see where they place the nozzle better yet close the books and buy a dyno.. I have them way high up and bet i have helped win more 24 hours of daytona than; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00263.html (9,611 bytes)
15. Re: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: Flowbench@aol.com; Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 00:49:32 EDT; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00267.html (8,731 bytes)
16. RE: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 06:31:21 -0400; Mike our job is to make the torque meter move any way we can for as many rpm as possible that is how i see it.. I personally don't buy the alky taking up room in the runner myself. If it evaporates t; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00268.html (10,092 bytes)
17. RE: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: "todd" <todd@twinjugs.com>; Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 13:46:23 +0000; Dave, do you care to explain the benefits behind keeping them upstream(or better yet, the problem with mounting them close to the valve)? Or do you prefer to just spout off that someone is clueless b; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00283.html (9,532 bytes)
18. RE: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: "todd" <todd@twinjugs.com>; Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 14:05:06 +0000; That's of some help, thanks Dave.; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00284.html (9,128 bytes)
19. RE: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 10:49:15 -0500; I'll plead "no contest" on this question, based on actual experience with fuel injector placement. Here's what I've read about the subject though-- a high placement gives more BHP due to better fuel; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00289.html (9,517 bytes)
20. RE: Fuel Injection Question (score: 1): Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 12:06:57 -0400; You are the winner!! of what i don't know though LOL If anyone cared to search the archives i bet they would have found a lot abut this.. The original question if rephrased slightly would have read,; /html/land-speed/2005-05/msg00292.html (9,938 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]