- 1. Re: Aussie rule changes (score: 1)
- Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 07:08:14 -0700
- Thanks, I will pass this on to everyone. Glen -- Original Message -- From: gary baker To: Glen Barrett Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 5:35 AM Subject: Aussie rule changes glen Here in OZ it is illega
- /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00552.html (7,570 bytes)
- 2. RE: Aussie rule changes (score: 1)
- Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 10:52:12 -0500
- Halon is illegal there? Hmmmm....If the concern is the "ozone hole" depletion (still debatable) by Freon, it would seem to be a rather trivial and distant concern if you were on fire!!! I'd rather h
- /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00554.html (8,101 bytes)
- 3. Re: Aussie rule changes (score: 1)
- Author: "Bryan A. Savage Jr" <basavage@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 11:09:55 -0700
- Based on what I have read (http://www.smh.com.au/) their concern isn't about the political left or any environmental groups ideas or opinion. It about the large increase in skin cancer and the high
- /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00555.html (9,142 bytes)
- 4. RE: Aussie rule changes (score: 1)
- Author: "Parks, David" <David.Parks@lfr.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 12:39:24 -0700
- "I'd rather have the most effective fire suppressant I could get..." I am not so sure that Halon products are the most effective fire suppressant. If plumbed to the right spots it can certainly put o
- /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00560.html (7,690 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu