Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*suspension\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*suspension\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. suspension (score: 1): Author: "riverside" <riverside@Cedar-Rapids.net>; Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 12:16:17 -0800; In the early '70's , the limitation on suspension pick-up points was still in the GCR. Most big TR's were seriously modified per our discussions and were passing tech anyway. I remember asking Bill B; /html/fot/2003-03/msg00007.html (6,615 bytes)
2. RE: suspension (score: 1): Author: "Brad Eells" <bradlnss@lightspeed.net>; Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 10:52:01 -0800; Lots of interesting discussion... My early TR4 still has it's early suspension - TR3 style upper A-arms. Somewhere along the way the upper A-arm mounting bracket that should mount horizontally on the; /html/fot/2003-03/msg00008.html (7,708 bytes)
3. RE: suspension (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:19:21 -0800; We're getting to the crux of this conversation. If the rule really does apply to the mounting points, as it is interpreted with radiators, then quite a lot of interesting changes are feasible. Moving; /html/fot/2003-03/msg00009.html (8,892 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]