Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Gonkulators\s+for\s+MGs\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Gonkulators\s+for\s+MGs\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Gonkulators for MGs? (score: 1): Author: Larry Colen <lrcar@red4est.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 14:55:20 -0700; On the mailing list for Airhead BMWs I ran across a reference to this fascintating website: http://www.fortunecity.com/silverstone/renault/59/gonk/gonk.html It sounds like exactly what I need to get; /html/british-cars/2003-07/msg00060.html (7,984 bytes)
2. RE: Gonkulators for MGs? (score: 1): Author: "Mark Gendron" <mgendron@speakeasy.org>; Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 15:54:01 -0700; "I know nuutheeng. . .nuuuuuuuutheeeng!" On the mailing list for Airhead BMWs I ran across a reference to this fascintating website: http://www.fortunecity.com/silverstone/renault/59/gonk/gonk.html I; /html/british-cars/2003-07/msg00062.html (8,053 bytes)
3. Re: Gonkulators for MGs? (score: 1): Author: "Robin Berens." <rberens@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 16:06:31 -0700; Fascinating, I believe I'll put a Gonkulator on my trusty Mountain Bike! I hear tell that this MB (with apologies to DIMLER Chrysler) version will allow me to ride serious technical trails backwards; /html/british-cars/2003-07/msg00063.html (9,177 bytes)
4. Re: Gonkulators for MGs? (score: 1): Author: "Robin Berens." <rberens@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 16:21:30 -0700; I just remembered that the Gonkulator was first used by the famous or in, Gonku bird which when it was installed flew in ever decreasing circles at ever increasing speeds until it eventually disappea; /html/british-cars/2003-07/msg00064.html (10,510 bytes)
5. Re: Gonkulators for MGs? (score: 1): Author: ARoman4047@aol.com; Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 19:31:08 EDT; << "I know nuutheeng. . .nuuuuuuuutheeeng!" >> "Paging John Ashcroft, white interrogation phone..." Tony in NJ W.A.S.T.E. /// british-cars@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http://www.team.net/c; /html/british-cars/2003-07/msg00065.html (7,579 bytes)
6. Re: Gonkulators for MGs? (score: 1): Author: Larry Colen <lrcar@red4est.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 01:45:39 -0700; No, but a contorter could increase performance by up to 23.47% versus an uncontorted gonkulator. However, if you use an aluminum rather than a brass contorter, it could lead to catastrophic failure a; /html/british-cars/2003-07/msg00069.html (7,968 bytes)
7. Re: Gonkulators for MGs? (score: 1): Author: "Robin Berens." <rberens@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:58:46 -0700; I beg to differ, based on absolutely no experience whatsoever, its actually approximately the 2nd non resonant harmonic raised to xth power! Believe me, please! -- Original Message -- From: "Larry Co; /html/british-cars/2003-07/msg00070.html (9,066 bytes)
8. Re: Gonkulators for MGs? (score: 1): Author: Diane and Roland Dudley <csx2282@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:57:00 -0700; So could having an aluminum body also lead to a catastrophic failure ? Roland On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 01:45:39 -0700 Larry Colen <lrcar@red4est.com> writes: /// british-cars@autox.team.net mailing list /; /html/british-cars/2003-07/msg00071.html (8,288 bytes)
9. Re: Gonkulators for MGs? (score: 1): Author: "Robin Berens." <rberens@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:41:59 -0700; Possibly! 707s & 767s & 747s etc have aluminum bodies, and have been known to fail, albeit catastrophically, which proves absolutely nothing! -- Original Message -- From: "Diane and Roland Dudley" <c; /html/british-cars/2003-07/msg00072.html (9,411 bytes)
10. Re: Gonkulators for MGs? (score: 1): Author: Craig Reese <creese@spillman.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 08:58:09 -0600; I have a '61 Bugeye with a 1275 engine in it. The previous owner had put in an electronic fuel pump, and it appears to be flooding out the SUs. At speed I can smell gas pretty strongly, but once stop; /html/british-cars/2003-07/msg00073.html (7,876 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]