british-cars
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Gonkulators for MGs?

To: "Larry Colen" <lrcar@red4est.com>, <mg-dennis@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Gonkulators for MGs?
From: "Robin Berens." <rberens@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:58:46 -0700
I  beg to differ, based on absolutely no experience whatsoever, its actually
approximately the 2nd non resonant harmonic raised to xth power!  Believe
me, please!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Colen" <lrcar@red4est.com>
To: <mg-dennis@mindspring.com>
Cc: "Larry Colen" <lrcar@red4est.com>; <mgs@autox.team.net>;
<british-cars@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 1:45 AM
Subject: Re: Gonkulators for MGs?


> On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 08:18:20PM -0700, mg-dennis@mindspring.com wrote:
> > So does the gonkulator require the use of a catastrophic contorter?
>
> No, but a contorter could increase performance by up to 23.47% versus
> an uncontorted gonkulator. However, if you use an aluminum rather than
> a brass contorter, it could lead to catastrophic failure at the
> third resonant harmonic.
>
> --
>                    Girling is not a verb.
> lrc@red4est.com
http://www.red4est.com/lrc
>
> ///  british-cars@autox.team.net mailing list
> ///  Send admin requests to majordomo@autox.team.net
> ///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
> ///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive
> ///  Send list postings to british-cars@autox.team.net

///  british-cars@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>