- 1. 3000 III off the mark. (score: 1)
- Author: Christopher Ball <triumph@io.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 1995 12:20:33 -0500 (EST)
- I had a terrible time getting any 1st gear speed out of my 64 3000. It was fabulous in the highway, but pulling away from the lights in town it was a dog. (for the car it is) There were three items t
- /html/british-cars/1995-01/msg00287.html (7,946 bytes)
- 2. Re: 3000 III off the mark. (score: 1)
- Author: Agustin de la Calle <delacall@bcmp.med.harvard.edu>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 1995 13:03:14 -0500 (EST)
- Hot stuff! Gus
- /html/british-cars/1995-01/msg00288.html (6,764 bytes)
- 3. Re: 3000 III off the mark. (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Lapham" <Dave_Lapham@oakqm3.sps.mot.com>
- Date: 10 Jan 1995 13:35:34 U
- Reply to: RE>3000 III off the mark. <stuff deleted> Hmmm, I feel pretty wimpy now. I was thinking I'd hold mine to under 7,000 RPM I've done this. I run light machine oil (sewing machine oil) in my d
- /html/british-cars/1995-01/msg00294.html (8,166 bytes)
- 4. Re: 3000 III off the mark. (score: 1)
- Author: Christopher Ball <triumph@io.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 1995 14:54:33 -0500 (EST)
- Ahem - yes I got a few replies to the 35000 powerband on my AH 3000. Really a "free rev" cam that eh?! O.K. 3500 RPM. Right Rev. Chris Ball Christopher Ball triumph@io.org Toronto, Ont. (416) 751-830
- /html/british-cars/1995-01/msg00296.html (6,949 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu