Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vehicle\s+eligibility\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vehicle\s+eligibility\.\.\.\s*$/: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Keith Hearn <khearn@Legato.COM>; Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 17:46:30 -0700; I wasn't suggesting that they try to flip it. If someone who knows what they're doing just takes it out and takes a few corners, they can probably get a good idea as to whether or not it's to tipsy; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00246.html (9,597 bytes)
22. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Keith Hearn <khearn@Legato.COM>; Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 17:47:44 -0700; There we go. Now I'm in the "Don't autox a Previa" camp. Keith Hearn '99 Miata 10AE "Sexy Sadie" the Sapphire Shark B-Stock Milpitas, CA; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00247.html (15,168 bytes)
23. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:03:45 -0400; Message text written by "Darren P. Madams" " BMW 318ti's?)" -- End Original Message -- These don't have a particularly good record. But I'm not aware of anyone keeping count of this model in autocros; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00254.html (9,320 bytes)
24. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Bill Hamburgen 650-617-3329 FAX -3374 <billh@pa.dec.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 10:22:52 -0700; I have both autocrossed my Previa and been up on two wheels in my GTI. My Previa is an Altrak, with a rear sway bar, good shocks, and slightly lower than stock due to low profile tires (215/60-15). I; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00255.html (10,884 bytes)
25. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 15:40:39 EDT; << I seem to recall Erik Strelnieks (M.D.!) rolling a BMW at the finish line on the left-side course at the National Pro Solo about three-four years ago. I believe he suffered a broken arm. As I reca; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00263.html (9,587 bytes)
26. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Derek Butts <pnc1@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:07:14 -0700; In fairness to this discussion the Toyota Van I drove had 175,000 miles on it with the original shocks and crappy tires. I think it was a 1989 with the narrower track and higher center of gravity. Th; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00264.html (11,998 bytes)
27. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 22:59:34 EDT; << I'm not claiming this formula is perfect, but I think it's better than excluding vehicles based on appearance. >> As SPORTS CAR Club of America official, I think we're going to make very small num; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00267.html (8,997 bytes)
28. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Carl Merritt <cmerritt@ati.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:52:43 -0700; Odd, my 300ZX is specifically EXCLUDED from one of the SCCA's classes because it *IS* "sports car based" (SM), so the implication that the SCCA is intended specifically for "Sports Cars" doesn't hold; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00270.html (10,289 bytes)
29. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Carl Merritt <cmerritt@ati.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:57:35 -0700; Sadly I can't find any measurement data on the old Toyota van, which also had a common propensity to blow up and/or catch on fire, but that's another story... Hey Kevin! Where did you get those track; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00271.html (13,100 bytes)
30. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 23:19:17 -0700; Google - "Toyota Previa wheelbase track". KeS; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00273.html (14,204 bytes)
31. Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Carl Merritt <cmerritt@ati.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 06:59:13 -0700; Ah, perfect, thanks Kevin: Vehicle Track Height Samurai 51.4 65.6 Wrangler 58.0 70.6 Sidekick 55.x 64.3 Previa 61.4 68.7 Camaro 60.6 51.8 Toy Van 56.7/54.5 70.3 So what if there was just a simple rul; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00274.html (15,661 bytes)
32. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 12:02:38 EDT; << Odd, my 300ZX is specifically EXCLUDED from one of the SCCA's classes because it *IS* "sports car based" (SM), so the implication that the SCCA is intended specifically for "Sports Cars" doesn't h; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00275.html (8,835 bytes)
33. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Kirk Meline <KMeline@iscribe.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:23:11 -0700; I for one will be very unhappy. Since the Mustang is no match for an M3, I was going to race my new Expedition. It definitely has more power, AWD, and load leveling suspension to handle my behind. Ki; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00276.html (9,589 bytes)
34. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: "Thana, Peter {High~Palo Alto}" <PETER.THANA@Roche.COM>; Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:38:37 -0700; Yeah, that old Toyo van also had an 88(!) inch wheelbase and utilized the driver's legs as an integral part of the energy absorbing crush zones. Friends who owned one tell me that the fear of rolling; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00282.html (15,176 bytes)
35. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Jim Ochi <jochi@liquidaudio.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:59:52 -0700; Yeah, but just think of all the SUVs we could get off the road if we introduced them to Solo II! Also, it's a good way to get TV coverage - I'm sure we could get more people to tune in to "DangerCros; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00286.html (9,278 bytes)
36. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Carl Merritt <cmerritt@ati.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 12:20:32 -0700; Aren't there regions that do rallycross or ice/snow autocrossing? That would make the DSMs a lot more attractive...=P -Carl; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00288.html (9,992 bytes)
37. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Kit Wetzler <kitwetzler@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 12:30:10 -0700; mmmmm... rally cross. Never have I made a car THAT dirty... http://www.mindspring.com/~kitwetzler/rallyx.html There is just something about laughing hysterically as you go over a 2 foot high jump at; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00290.html (8,957 bytes)
38. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: "Navid Kahangi" <nkahangi@interwoven.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 13:38:13 -0700; Good thing you are mature, practical, M3 driver now...well, 1 out of 3 ain't --Navid; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00292.html (9,697 bytes)
39. RE: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Jim Ochi <jochi@liquidaudio.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 14:24:45 -0700; Wait a sec - I thought he was a trash-talkin' Audi-baiting slow-driving Street Mod driver! Jim; /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00293.html (8,702 bytes)
40. Re: Vehicle eligibility... (score: 1): Author: Kit Wetzler <kitwetzler@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 14:50:59 -0700; might be OSP, if our stock keeps going up... come here, turbo and TEC-II! -kit, 500 horsepower M3 in the making :); /html/ba-autox/2000-10/msg00294.html (8,639 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]