Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Stockton\s+slalom\s+\-\s+which\s+way\s+did\s+you\s+go\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: "Watson, Mark" <Mark.Watson@Schwab.COM>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 10:46:28 -0700
Just curious, In the optional direction slalom, what line do you feel was fastest ? It seemed to me, taking the inside line on the first cone allowed you to eliminate an extra turn, but required a ti
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00033.html (8,365 bytes)

2. Re: Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: Scot Zediker <mx5_1991@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 10:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
I tried both, although I did the outside line by accident on my third run (came into the slalom too hot). I thought starting the slalom on the inside was quicker because it gave me a better line into
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00034.html (9,501 bytes)

3. Re: Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Jones <axng4me@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 11:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
I went inside-out-in and clicked off 1/2 second on every run. First time I saw a "choose your own direction" slalom and thought it was great. Heck of a course and the Neon really seemed to like it. p
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00035.html (9,316 bytes)

4. Re: Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:28:03 PDT
They were both optional. I believe inside on both was best. The rest of my remarks assume that you meant the first slalom. That line wasn't really tight due to the corner opening up quite a bit. See
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00037.html (10,818 bytes)

5. Re: Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:31:13 PDT
That's a trick question - I never upshifted. ;) KeS
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00038.html (9,207 bytes)

6. Re: Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:51:49 -0400
The second slalom appeared to have had pointer cones added sometime during the day. Rich
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00040.html (7,825 bytes)

7. Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 15:47:52 -0400
Message text written by "Watson, Mark" "Just curious, In the optional direction slalom, what line do you feel was fastest ? It seemed to me, taking the inside line on the first cone allowed you to el
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00043.html (9,158 bytes)

8. Re: Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 15:56:45 -0400
Message text written by INTERNET:Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com "I know there's a strong contingent that disapproves of optional slaloms - the most common expression I hear is "guessing game". I never loo
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00044.html (9,849 bytes)

9. Re: Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 15:59:57 -0400
Message text written by Rich Urschel "The second slalom appeared to have had pointer cones added sometime during the day. Rich" -- End Original Message -- Yep. Wonder why that happend? --John Kelly
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00045.html (9,174 bytes)

10. Re: Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: Scot Zediker <mx5_1991@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 13:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
Hey, I resemble that remark! ;) But seriously, on my very first autox run ever, I completely missed a slalom. It was called in, however. And where and when was this event? Stockton, CA, November 1997
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00047.html (9,812 bytes)

11. Re: Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 13:49:52 -0400
Nope. Rich
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00048.html (7,917 bytes)

12. Re: Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: Scot Zediker <mx5_1991@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 11:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
Well, not all of us can break 50 mph in first :) == Scot Zediker mx5_1991@yahoo.com San Jose, CA "If at first you don't succeed, don't try skydiving."
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00049.html (8,890 bytes)

13. RE: Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: Carl Merritt <cmerritt@ati.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 15:48:04 -0700
Find a tall enough cliff and you can do anything... =P Sorry for the delay on the video this time, but my fast net connection is down, and I'm not uploading 90MB of stuff at 28.8k. Hopefully I'll ha
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00050.html (9,099 bytes)

14. Re: Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 22:50:21 EDT
My car owner (Mark Searles... Turnabout IS fairplay!) and I decided to each try it (the first slalom) differently on our first runs, and agreed that starting the second slalom to the left of the firs
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00051.html (10,579 bytes)

15. Re: Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: Craig Boyle <craig_boyle@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 20:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
There were TWO slaloms Sunday? Wow, I thought they said the first one was an option. :-) Craig
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00052.html (8,943 bytes)

16. Re: Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: "James Creasy" <jcre@mozart.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 21:21:02 -0700
slaloms? i thought when the chalk lines stopped that meant to lose control and spin out. how did i do on style points? -James Creasy President, BAPOC www.klio.net/probe FFR Cobra #1630 www.klio.net/c
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00053.html (9,441 bytes)

17. Re: Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: "Benjamin R. Martinez" <brmcapri@usa.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 21:23:22 -0700
To all, I beg differ about the optional direction slalom, as in the first paragraph, i had to figure out the slaloms to go fast, isn't that the best way to learn about an auto-x course? if you think
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00054.html (11,753 bytes)

18. RE: Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 21:56:31 -0700
That's ok, Charlie, we don't have to agree all the time. It doesn't hurt you to be wrong every once in awhile... ;) KeS
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00056.html (8,911 bytes)

19. Re: Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: "Donald R McKenna" <donbarbmckenna@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 06:46:51 -0700
Downshifted? After running, Chris cox and I discussed the fact that we were "bogged" a couple of places on the course --in low gear. Never hit the rev-limiter anywhere. Don
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00059.html (9,755 bytes)

20. Re: Stockton slalom - which way did you go (score: 1)
Author: Scot Zediker <mx5_1991@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 07:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
-- Donald R McKenna <donbarbmckenna@earthlink.net> So I guess that big ol' LT4 motor doesn't have much low end? If you think you were bogging, you shoulda tried those last two turns (and the hard rig
/html/ba-autox/2000-04/msg00061.html (8,613 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu