Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rotary\s+torque\s+\&\s+noise\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rotary\s+torque\s+\&\s+noise\s*$/: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Rotary torque & noise (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 17:21:33 -0800; My sweeping statement was power determines acceleration, not torque. Of course the condition is that the gearing of the car is matched to the engine. This was so obvious that I neglected to mention; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00213.html (9,418 bytes)
22. Re: Rotary torque & noise (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 17:25:50 -0800; Now that you're introducing real-world factors, let me introduce another. The higher revving engine (B) is usually smaller and lighter than the engine that gets the same torque at lower RPM (B). This; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00214.html (10,143 bytes)
23. Re: Rotary torque & noise (score: 1): Author: "Mike Allendorfer" <mwa96imp@regionofdoom.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 18:53:53 -0800; More succinctly stated, the area under the curve is what tells the tale, particularly as the weight to horsepower ratio gets worse. Mike Allendorfer (The Taxi Driver) -- Original Message -- From: Ken; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00216.html (9,933 bytes)
24. Re: Rotary torque & noise (score: 1): Author: Andy McKee <andrewmckee@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 23:26:15 -0800 (PST); Yes.:-) I was trying to think of the source of confusion here and it may have to with the following. A very simple equation for determining force available for acceleration is... F = torque * overal; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00218.html (10,443 bytes)
25. Re: Rotary torque & noise (score: 1): Author: Dan Bratten <dbratten@ainet.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 00:35:29 -0800; May I ask for clarification to my question about Torque = HP @ 5,252 RPM which was explained to be true? Are there cases where Torque and HP will both be increasing beyond 5,252 RPM? I can see it plo; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00219.html (9,430 bytes)
26. RE: Rotary torque & noise (score: 1): Author: "Allendorfer, Peter" <Peter@regionofdoom.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 06:35:52 -0800; Ever been on a Motorcycle?? They will be climbing that torque curve to about 10,000rpm (At least the modern Crotch-Rockets will...... And also about the size of the torque curve. That's what Dirt-bik; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00220.html (9,979 bytes)
27. Re: Rotary torque & noise (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 08:56:25 -0800; My last bike had torque and power increasing to 11,500 RPM, where torque leveled off. Power increased to 13,000 RPM, where it hit the rev limiter. On the S2000, Torque & Power both increase past 5,25; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00224.html (10,728 bytes)
28. Re: Rotary torque & noise (score: 1): Author: Dan Bratten <dbratten@ainet.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 09:38:38 -0800; Looks like I fell victim to 'late night reasoning' -- or lack thereof. Yes, I remember my motorcrossers well, now that you mention it. Seems I forgot when I posed the question. My S800 would be anoth; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00225.html (11,473 bytes)
29. RE: Rotary torque & noise (score: 1): Author: "Allendorfer, Peter" <Peter@regionofdoom.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:11:35 -0800; Or, if you really wanted to go the other way completely....... Take, for example a Diesel Electric Locomotive. Say, the EMD SD-90MAC. The prime-mover (Diesel Engine) is a V-16 2-stroke Direct Injecti; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00227.html (12,475 bytes)
30. RE: Rotary torque & noise (score: 1): Author: Scot Zediker <mx5_1991@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:32:10 -0800 (PST); -- "Allendorfer, Peter" <Peter@regionofdoom.com> I remember some years ago Car & Driver did a "track test" of a diesel-electric locomotive. One thing they said about the engine's output was that it h; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00231.html (9,236 bytes)
31. Re: Rotary torque & noise (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:13:46 -0800; Of course it's the 6000 hp that's moving the train. You can get that 6000 hp any way you want. The train uses 35,014 ft. lbs. at 900 RPM. But you could also get it with 3,500 ft. lbs. at 9,000 RPM, o; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00246.html (9,916 bytes)
32. Re: Rotary torque & noise (score: 1): Author: Sethracer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 18:44:14 EST; << BTW, what's the most powerful engine made in the world? Is it the nuclear reactor on aircraft carriers? It takes a LOT of power to push a ship the size of the empire state building through the oce; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00248.html (8,208 bytes)
33. RE: Rotary torque & noise (score: 1): Author: "Allendorfer, Peter" <Peter@regionofdoom.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 06:09:18 -0800; The most power-full single engine ever, as far as I know....., is the Saturn 5 Rocket Booster. It's the booster that got the Apollo Moon shots off the ground. What is funny, is it was called the Powe; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00255.html (10,275 bytes)
34. RE: Rotary torque & noise (score: 1): Author: "Allendorfer, Peter" <Peter@regionofdoom.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 13:20:42 -0800; I don't know if you guys have seen this yet, but this guy is way cool. He's been around for ever and is about the smartest person I have ever read. http://www.theoldone.com/archive/world-according-1-; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00260.html (10,873 bytes)
35. Re: Rotary torque & noise (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 20:00:51 -0800; He sounds like an interesting character, but some of his comments contradict reality thus should be taken with a grain of salt. He's basically saying the following: "Low torque, high RPM engines are; /html/ba-autox/2000-01/msg00268.html (13,112 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 35
Page: [1] [2]