- 81. Re: [solo2sc] Safety note (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 21:38:59 -0700
- Maybe to those who haven't yet been airborne or broken significant car parts there. :-) Rich Urschel
- /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00479.html (7,485 bytes)
- 82. Re: [solo2sc] Safety note (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 22:59:35 -0700
- I don't remember if that was one I passed on or one of the many days I had to slow down to a crawl to navigate the Jimmy Hoffa hump. Several years ago we had a narrow chicane thingy designed to irrit
- /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00487.html (8,305 bytes)
- 83. Re: Make / Model of loaner helmets? (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 23:21:41 -0700
- The artiste is the world famous bubble gum painter, Don Ebaugh. I hear he can be quite expensive but couldn't make a helmet look bad if he tried. Rich Urschel
- /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00529.html (7,124 bytes)
- 84. Re: New rule?????? (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:05:20 -0700
- In theory, the competitor is supposed to have the correct class on their car and tech inspection is supposed to check it. Failing this, there is little way for a competitor to know who is actually ru
- /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00680.html (9,084 bytes)
- 85. Re: New rule?????? (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 19:07:48 -0700
- I was not addressing class legality, only the need to properly display correct numbers and class letters on the car. Correct in this context is simply the class entered. I was once temporarily failed
- /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00687.html (8,235 bytes)
- 86. Dirt bagging smokers and spewers (score: 1)
- Author: "Rich Urschel" <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 19:40:24 -0700
- First "Allendorfer, Mike" tells us: And now he shares these caustic and misinformed words: dirt-bag slip are The State of California made 25 year old cars exempt from smog inspections because there a
- /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00844.html (7,844 bytes)
- 87. Re: Lotus sales and stories (score: 1)
- Author: "Rich Urschel" <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 19:12:07 -0700
- Maybe you could come up a tad after that promised free autocross? I can be had. I owned a different Elan in the 60's so I knew what I was getting into when I went to test drive this one. However, Kar
- /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00884.html (7,272 bytes)
- 88. Re: June 10 at GGF/Marina (double header!) (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 18:30:21 -0700
- Just a point of clarification. There is no "we" about it. The event chairs do have some latitude in running their specific events. However, what is allowed by one chair at one event is not binding on
- /html/ba-autox/2001-06/msg00026.html (7,235 bytes)
- 89. Re: Divisionals! Don't Put Off Entering! (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:26:15 -0700
- You could be the poster boy. Oh wait, never mind, you are. http://www.sfrscca.org/solo2/Results/2001/Divisional/ Rich
- /html/ba-autox/2001-06/msg00285.html (9,097 bytes)
- 90. Re: Stopping for Timing Slips (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 17:15:14 -0700
- Jesus, Apparently you missed the previous post below. As for common law (undocumented) rules, see the mandatory SIIR rule 1.4.E (2000 book numbering). A motion to write a new rule or rules imposing a
- /html/ba-autox/2001-05/msg00084.html (8,422 bytes)
- 91. Re: The Wheel (was) SFR communication (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 17:16:07 -0700
- John, The issue of The Wheel which arrived at my house early this week is the May issue containing the March SC minutes. Given that we the committee sit on the minutes for 30 days before approving th
- /html/ba-autox/2001-05/msg00234.html (7,458 bytes)
- 92. Re: Stopping for Timing Slips (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 17:06:49 -0700
- The rule book (2000) actually recommends against coming to a complete stop after the finish line. SFR supp 10 gives some authority for DSQ due to unsafely exiting the course without stopping. I've ne
- /html/ba-autox/2001-04/msg00210.html (8,246 bytes)
- 93. Re: Stopping for Timing Slips (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:07:16 -0700
- Well then I think we are back to Katie's question. So which rule authorizes whom to call a DNF under what conditions? I can't find it either. BTW, I personally think DNF is the wrong penalty because
- /html/ba-autox/2001-04/msg00214.html (9,011 bytes)
- 94. Re: Stopping for Timing Slips (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 15:12:52 -0700
- And would perhaps that place be in the minds of people presuming more authority than they actually have? Rich
- /html/ba-autox/2001-04/msg00238.html (7,905 bytes)
- 95. Re: Non-comp runs? (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 17:45:13 -0700
- The availability of SFR's second set of runs depends on the event chairs' assessment of attendance, and their communication to registration. Ask at registration the day of the event. No one else can
- /html/ba-autox/2001-04/msg00248.html (7,973 bytes)
- 96. Re: draft new supplemental regs: comments? (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:05:55 -0700
- We already have 50 SFR supplemental rules which almost no one reads, and the SC members, including myself, can't remember. We don't need to (and can't) codify every possible unsafe act. If we have co
- /html/ba-autox/2001-04/msg00271.html (8,356 bytes)
- 97. SC decision to draft new supplemental regs or not (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 23:11:49 -0700
- A motion to write a new rule or rules imposing a DNF for failing to stop for a timing slip when one is offered, or if one's vehicle makes contact with the timing lights, and a ban on cell phones whil
- /html/ba-autox/2001-04/msg00274.html (7,372 bytes)
- 98. Re: M3 tire question (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 15:14:43 -0700
- Jerry, There's this other guy named Jerry Mouton who appears to say otherwise on his website: "13.4 Wheels "Any type wheel may be used provided it complies with the following: it is the same width an
- /html/ba-autox/2001-04/msg00434.html (8,666 bytes)
- 99. Re: Fw: Standard Wheel sizes in Stock Category (staggered (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 18:42:57 -0700
- I'm not so sure. If you could order 15x7's on the front and you could order 15x7's on the rear, then I think you've met the letter of the rule whether you could have done it with a single "normal" or
- /html/ba-autox/2001-04/msg00452.html (7,454 bytes)
- 100. Re: Advice Sought: 6 Point Harness? and East Bay Powder (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 20:54:50 -0700
- Decided against it, figuring it would hurt really bad using my OEM seat. Way back is ok, but just how strong is your parcel shelf? Simpson's catalog is quite helpful and available for free by calling
- /html/ba-autox/2001-04/msg00463.html (7,522 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu