Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*skirts\s+in\s+mod\s+class\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*skirts\s+in\s+mod\s+class\s+question\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. skirts in mod class question (score: 1): Author: Doug Miller <drmiller@intcc.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 18:06:41 -0600; the rule book says on page 134: "The sealing of the chassis/body to the ground with skirts is prohibited." I read this that skirts aren't illegal, as long as they don't SEAL. So I can run skirts as; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01166.html (7,572 bytes)
2. Re: skirts in mod class question (score: 1): Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 20:04:00 -0500; At first, I thought this was another ladies class post...... :) Sounds like your building something! Total WAG here, but you may get into an interpretation of what "seal" means. I'm supposing that co; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01169.html (8,336 bytes)
3. Re: skirts in mod class question (score: 1): Author: Doug Miller <drmiller@intcc.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 19:09:46 -0600; Yup. but fairly obviously running boards on a pickemup are NOT "skirts". I figured I'd post to the list to find out if there is some famous history of a clearly defined description that is known to a; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01172.html (8,298 bytes)
4. Re: skirts in mod class question (score: 1): Author: "Mike Taylor" <miket@interaccess.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 21:11:26 -0500; So, if you really want to talk about women running in mod classes, calling them "skirts" is almost as bad as calling them "powderpuffs"! Note: This is a (not very good) JOKE" intended to get us all b; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01178.html (9,182 bytes)
5. Re: skirts in mod class question (score: 1): Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@home.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 19:32:41 -0700; I seriously thought this was going to be a thread about some of the guys I saw in Topeka. I don't think I want to see a guy in The Bud Dress in a Mod car. :-) Seems like a difficult rule based on the; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01179.html (7,422 bytes)
6. Re: skirts in mod class question (score: 1): Author: Hottvr@aol.com; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 23:32:15 EDT; << So, if you really want to talk about women running in mod classes, calling them "skirts" is almost as bad as calling them "powderpuffs"! Note: This is a (not very good) JOKE" intended to get us al; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01183.html (7,738 bytes)
7. Re: skirts in mod class question (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 01:35:21 -0500; Okay, serious answer, Doug, from one who is not really deep into mod so it may be worth about as much as those goofy answers. First, IMHO, you do seem to have found a loophole. But, Second, can you g; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01187.html (8,935 bytes)
8. RE: skirts in mod class question (score: 1): Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 08:18:19 -0500; --Original Message-- And for those thinking about sucker cars, they were banned years ago (Andy Whittle had one once). --Rocky == And in light of this year's AM incident, perhaps they should be allow; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01191.html (7,703 bytes)
9. Re: skirts in mod class question (score: 1): Author: Bob Monday <boysrus_racing@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 17:06:43 -0700 (PDT); Is this another one of those Ladies-Only Class issues? <G> (Honoring Mike B's request to respond in public forum...) Bob Monday BOYS-R-Us Racing <snip> _______________________________________________; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01284.html (7,902 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]