- 41. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1)
- Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:37:46 -0500
- -- Original Message -- From: "Charles Cox" <charles@coastalbay.com> To: <rocky@tri.net> Cc: <dave2020@mindspring.com>; <jlieberman@sport.rr.com>; <dave@wcsllc.net>; <fpspitfire37@msn.com>; "Autox" <a
- /html/autox/2002-10/msg00310.html (13,363 bytes)
- 42. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1)
- Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:42:56 -0500
- Don's right. Modified class listings, F Mod: "listed weights are with driver." Page 216. Presumably that fellow that came up 2 pounds light was not only in the car, but with his helmet at the time of
- /html/autox/2002-10/msg00311.html (9,972 bytes)
- 43. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1)
- Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:09:15 -0500
- something First of all, please remember this was 1) a solitary incident, and 2) twenty years ago! And 3) if it wasn't in the car when it went through tech then the inspectors never saw it. And 4) it
- /html/autox/2002-10/msg00313.html (9,155 bytes)
- 44. RE: minimum weight requirement (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Fuhrmann" <fuhrmann@cpinternet.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:59:41 -0500
- What assumption is being made? The only assumption that I have seen made is that the word "vehicle" somehow means "vehicle AND DRIVER". /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.tea
- /html/autox/2002-10/msg00315.html (8,254 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu