Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*What\s+happened\s+to\s+the\s+Neon\?\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. Re: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 07:36:22 -0600
Disclaimer: Do not assume that I am defending DC becauce I drive in DS. It is important that people do not perpetuate mis-information. Some folks have an ax to grind, and often portray past events in
/html/autox/1999-12/msg00003.html (8,428 bytes)

2. Re: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: DG50@daimlerchrysler.com
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 09:43:50 -0500
For the record, DaimlerChrysler <salute!> does not involve me in any of their racing programme decisions, nor their car production decisions, nor their warrenty decisions, their recall decisions, the
/html/autox/1999-12/msg00008.html (7,194 bytes)

3. Re: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: DG50@daimlerchrysler.com
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 09:47:04 -0500
Aux contraire, mon ami! Tous ces choses... uhh... all dese tings are completely legal for Solo II in Street Modified! DG
/html/autox/1999-12/msg00009.html (7,124 bytes)

4. RE: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: "Brunner, William Jr." <BrunnerW@dnb.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 09:48:11 -0500
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --_=_NextPart_000_01BF3C0A.EE5AE6DC charset=iso-8859-1 WOW!, yo
/html/autox/1999-12/msg00010.html (11,627 bytes)

5. Re: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 08:05:02 -0700
AND in Street Prepared. Would be nice if they released them on future ACR's too Scott Meyers My 96 ACR was reliable and never in the shop for warrantee problems..... Just the body shop because of the
/html/autox/1999-12/msg00011.html (7,510 bytes)

6. RE: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: NASA-VA Jon Felton <nasa-va@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:36:11 -0500
Sorry if this has already been covered, but there will be an ACR and an R/T model Neon for 2001. We saw a 2001 ACR at the SEMA show last month, at the DC transporter, decked out in SSC roadrace trim.
/html/autox/1999-12/msg00049.html (7,628 bytes)

7. What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Glover" <rob@f-body.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 12:23:13 -0800
Granted, I'm not a big FWD enthusiast, but I do remember how great the original Dodge/Plymouth Neons (particularly the ACR) were as autocross cars. Now it appears it only comes as a four-door, and on
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01217.html (7,609 bytes)

8. RE: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: "Brunner, William Jr." <BrunnerW@dnb.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 15:29:29 -0500
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --_=_NextPart_000_01BF3B71.67908632 charset=iso-8859-1 DC claim
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01218.html (11,964 bytes)

9. Re: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 13:49:45 -0700
I noticed this also, and also know that the 2000 Neon is 150# *heavier* that the earlier versions. Even if they come back with the ACR model with the twin cam engine, it will not be as fast. Maybe wi
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01220.html (8,403 bytes)

10. Re: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: Derek Engelhaupt <derekengelhaupt@rocketmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 13:12:05 -0800 (PST)
You all will have to pardon me, the word "Neon" sends shivers down my spine every time I hear someone say that they might be interested in purchasing one. I bought one in '95 (a Nitro Yellow/Green Sp
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01223.html (9,871 bytes)

11. Re: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: "Chris Marsh" <cmarsh90@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 13:24:33 PST
I think I'm repeating old info here, but as I remember Chrysler pulled much of their contingency money for amateur racing and are going to field a NASCAR "car" in the near future, so it seems that si
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01224.html (8,878 bytes)

12. Re: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: Jason Bowles <jbowles@carol.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 16:30:05 -0500
2001 ACR and R/T are 2 different cars and will have a base engine of a 150hp SOHC engine that is more powerfull and better power curves than the old DOHC 150hp engine could wish for. It will also hav
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01225.html (9,783 bytes)

13. Re: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: John Lieberman <johnlee@softdisk.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 16:02:37 -0600
Daimler/Chrysler got a big burr under their saddle with the SCCA a few months ago over the allowance of trunk kits for other cars in Showroom Stock racing. So they pulled all of their contingency mon
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01227.html (8,876 bytes)

14. RE: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson, Lindsay (L.S.)" <lwilson1@visteon.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 17:04:35 -0500
While Daimler Chrysler (Chrysler) have pulled their contingency programs, they are still involved in grass roots motor sports. Witness their involvement in the Showroom Stock testing at Mid Ohio this
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01229.html (10,032 bytes)

15. Re: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 16:12:24 -0700
Don't they still support the Vipers in FIA? I think it's just SCCA that they were P.O'd at. -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR '87 Quantum Syncro - aka stealth
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01237.html (9,050 bytes)

16. Re: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Miller" <lmiller2@airmail.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 17:16:08 -0600
DC has it's hands in several other MotorSports categories: FIA, World of Outlaws, NHRA, IHRA, NASCAR Craftsman Truck, CART, Formula 1 and NASCAR Winston Cup / Bush (soon). A Viper ACR is available an
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01244.html (10,358 bytes)

17. Re: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 16:40:35 -0700
I know, it's just the SCCA that DC thumbed their nose at. But those things are not likely to be legal for SCCA SoloII anyway. -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVO
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01245.html (9,233 bytes)

18. Re: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: Jason Bowles <jbowles@carol.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 18:22:47 -0500
Actually in SP they will all be legal..lots of new SP parts that arent being made by the aftermarket like underdrive pulleys for the accessories I didnt see the airdam tho do you know a part number o
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01247.html (10,029 bytes)

19. Re: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: John Lieberman <johnlee@softdisk.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 17:31:00 -0600
Good point, Josh. I didn't mean to insinuate that they were PO'd at everybody - just the SCCA. And, let's face it - even though the Viper is one heckuva car, there are far more Neons than Vipers invo
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01248.html (9,281 bytes)

20. Re: What happened to the Neon? (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 16:57:18 -0700
Yeah, I should have added "stock category" in there. -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR '87 Quantum Syncro - aka stealth quattro jhadler@rmi.net http://rainbow
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01249.html (8,404 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu