Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Stock\s+rear\s+swaybar\s+leagality\s+question\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Stock rear swaybar leagality question (score: 1)
Author: Lee Piccione <leepic@smart.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 15:13:41 -0500
This past weekend I was changing the rear struts on my '92 MR2 and because of some excess rust (Northern NY car) one of the rear sway bar end links was pretty boogered up and can't be reused. I went
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01008.html (8,126 bytes)

2. Re: Stock rear swaybar leagality question (score: 1)
Author: "Karl Rickert" <alfakarl@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 12:57:32 PST
We'll it sounds like ya got a CSP MR2 to me ;) Karl Rickert CS #38 Alfa Romeo Spider TLS #25
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01011.html (8,597 bytes)

3. Re: Stock rear swaybar leagality question (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 14:55:48 -0600
MR2. I guess is If it's the part Toyota shows as the correct replacement for your car, it's legal. That fits the definition of "as specified by the factory." Jay
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01012.html (8,312 bytes)

4. Re: Stock rear swaybar leagality question (score: 1)
Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 16:40:11 -0500
Sorry Lee, you'll have to sell the car and find something else to run......no wait! I kinda like seeing you in CS! :-) IMO, this would definitely fall in the weenie protest arena, but the rulebook re
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01013.html (9,170 bytes)

5. Re: Stock rear swaybar leagality question (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 16:23:44 -0600
source If the factory discontinues the original part and sells a newer part as its direct replacement, then the new part is in full compliance with the above. What constitutes "standard part specs" i
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01015.html (8,530 bytes)

6. Re: Stock rear swaybar leagality question (score: 1)
Author: Lee Piccione <leepic@smart.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 18:49:08 -0500
I verified thru a second dealer that the part numbers are identical for the '91, the '92, and the '93-'95. Looks like it is a factory spec part... Lee CS '92 MR2
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01019.html (8,752 bytes)

7. Re: Stock rear swaybar leagality question (score: 1)
Author: Josh Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 16:55:03 -0700
I think it's only legal if there's a Toyota (in this case) paper trail to prove that it's an authorized substitution. And I doubt it would be weenie if those endlinks stiffened up the rear bar, even
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01020.html (9,044 bytes)

8. RE: Stock rear swaybar leagality question (score: 1)
Author: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 16:55:35 -0700
Just save your receipt with the part number. I think in the case of a part being superseded the burden of proof falls on the person filling the protest. You should not have to go to the trouble of ge
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01022.html (9,831 bytes)

9. Re: Stock rear swaybar leagality question (score: 1)
Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 20:00:59 -0800
Good point. And make damn sure that the original part isn't still being sold by the manufacturer. A manufacturer can change a part in one of two ways: 1) a running production change (update) in which
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01025.html (9,200 bytes)

10. Re: Stock rear swaybar leagality question (score: 1)
Author: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 20:05:45 -0500
Supersessions may override this opinion. I was a Toyota parts manager who owned a MR2. All of the following came from my microfiche (April '94). 48820-17020. Non turbos then used 48820-17040 from 920
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01026.html (10,321 bytes)

11. Re: Stock rear swaybar leagality question (score: 1)
Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 23:32:16 -0600
Yes. The factory says it is stock. It is stock. Phil Ethier Saint Paul Minnesota USA 1970 Lotus Europa, 1992 Saturn SL2, 1986 Chev Suburban LOON, MAC pethier@isd.net http://www.visi.com/mac/
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01042.html (8,239 bytes)

12. Re: Stock rear swaybar leagality question (score: 1)
Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 23:37:12 -0600
No, it would fall in the failed protest area. The part number he got from the Toyota book IS the "standard part specs". Nope. A copy of the official Toyota parts manual for his car, which he has alre
/html/autox/1999-11/msg01046.html (8,795 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu