To: | "Lee Piccione" <leepic@smart.net>, "Team.Net" <autox@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Stock rear swaybar leagality question |
From: | "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com> |
Date: | Tue, 23 Nov 1999 14:55:48 -0600 |
Lee said: > When I >got to the parts >department I noticed the end link looks like one from a '93-'95 MR2. I >had the parts guy >double check and it is indeed the part listed for my car. My guess is >that thru time the newer >end link superseded the old one. Is this legal for stock class? If it's the part Toyota shows as the correct replacement for your car, it's legal. That fits the definition of "as specified by the factory." Jay |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: More info on Sugar Grove Track, Steve Wielgus |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Stock rear swaybar leagality question, Karl Rickert |
Previous by Thread: | Stock rear swaybar leagality question, Lee Piccione |
Next by Thread: | Re: Stock rear swaybar leagality question, Karl Rickert |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |