Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SS\s+changes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SS\s+changes\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: SS changes (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 08:45:45 -0400; I forgot about the old Vettes. At least move all the pre-84s to FS. That would be an improvement, although they'd still be a long shot. Kent Rafferty; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00006.html (7,374 bytes)
2. SS changes (score: 1): Author: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 12:28:42 -0700; With the possible input of new SS cars, and the change in the technology level in the past few years. I would like to see some of the older slower cars moved from SS. I would like all of you to join; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01755.html (7,061 bytes)
3. Re: SS changes (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:40:35 -0700; HAH!! You obviously forgot the smiley... here you go... :-) Yeah, "older and slower"... sure... Next thing you know Jason here will be trying to sell us some Tennessee beach front property... -Josh2; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01760.html (7,599 bytes)
4. Re: SS changes (score: 1): Author: "George Lynch" <george.lynch@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 21:55:52 -0700; with them. :-); /html/autox/1999-09/msg01807.html (7,572 bytes)
5. RE: SS changes (score: 1): Author: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:33:27 -0700; Now I know you are retired, so I will take it easy on you. A 93' R1, the first year, is only 6 yrs old, not 8. Time is just a blur....lol. I will forgive you, if you park it and bring the vette back.; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01830.html (8,945 bytes)
6. Re: SS changes (score: 1): Author: "George Lynch" <george.lynch@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 17:57:29 -0700; *You are a kind person :-) A 93' R1,the first year, is only 6 yr. old, not 8. *My car was made in March of 1992, and the technology for it was one to two years old at that time. I guess I can really; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01841.html (7,721 bytes)
7. Re: SS changes (score: 1): Author: "MICHAEL WHITEHOUSE" <whthse@c2i2.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 21:07:52 -0600; I should jump in and defend Jason by asking what year technology a small block Chevy represents? Michael Whitehouse -- two wheels. run; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01850.html (8,510 bytes)
8. Re: SS changes (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 09:06:29 -0400; George, what do you consider older C4's? This is strictly my ill-informed opinion, but I'd think the '86-87 Z51 and 89 Z51 Vette's may be the best autocrossers of the C4s. The 92-95 ZO7 Vettes have d; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01856.html (7,789 bytes)
9. Re: SS changes (score: 1): Author: "Chris Teague" <cteague@home.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 19:58:46 -0700; So would you move those old, slow, C3 Corvette's to BS? Clearly the C4 is superior to the C3 in stock form, right? I sold my 90 Vette to buy and AS M3. If they move the C4 to AS, I will have to go b; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01985.html (7,705 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]