autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SS changes

To: "George Lynch" <george.lynch@worldnet.att.net>,
Subject: Re: SS changes
From: "MICHAEL WHITEHOUSE" <whthse@c2i2.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 21:07:52 -0600
I should jump in and defend Jason by asking what year technology a small
block Chevy represents? 

Michael Whitehouse
----------
> From: George  Lynch <george.lynch@worldnet.att.net>
> To: Isley, Jason C. <JIsley@cell1.com>
> Cc: autox@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: SS changes
> Date: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 6:57 PM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Now I know you are retired, so I will take it easy on you.
> 
> *You are a kind person  :-)
> 
> 
> A 93' R1,the first year, is only 6 yr. old, not 8.
> 
> *My car was made in March of 1992, and the technology for it was one to
two
>   years old at that time.  I guess I can really claim 10 year old
> technology.
> :-(
> 
> Time is just a blur....lol. I will forgive you, if you park it and bring
> the vette back.
> 
> *That has been and will be discussed on a regular bases.  :-)
> 
> >Lets be fair, my car has the same hp as yours, approx.. 250, and weighs
> >500lbs more.
> 
> *True, but with the 500 lbs. you get 1 1/2 in wider and 1 in taller
wheels.
>   You also get 1 3/4 in more tread.  :-(
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Enough fun.  On a more serious note,  SCCA has split up a lot of cars to
> make all
> versions competitive.  I think at least the early C4 should not have to
run
> with the later
> ones and the C5.
> 
> 
> 
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>