Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SP\s+rules\s+on\s+catalytic\s+converters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SP\s+rules\s+on\s+catalytic\s+converters\s*$/: 60 ]

Total 60 documents matching your query.

41. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:58:50 -0600; -- I agree. I drive a Mk3 Supra, 220Hp stock max, maybe 235-240 with allowable MODs on a nice COLD day. Stock FS, then ESP. So, the MK4 is basically a huge big-fix for the MK3 supra, HUGE performanc; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01317.html (9,442 bytes)
42. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:46:47 -0800; I like it -- but only because it favors the SVO, which can make well over 20 psi and flow up to 300 hp with the stock turbo and an engine modified to SP rules. Richard Nichols rnichol1@san.rr.com San; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01319.html (11,258 bytes)
43. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 15:24:46 -0500; If we would take a Well there are many more non-turbo's out there. Turbo cars also make more power from engines that weight less, and are not hurt on big courses (remember I have lots of turbo seat t; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01322.html (11,060 bytes)
44. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:40:03 -0800; Seems like, if "intercoolers are unrestricted" in SP as stated (OK, 98 rule book, 14.10.C, could be obsolete) then we'd better find one with a bypass valve in it! The principal benefit I would get (S; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01323.html (9,588 bytes)
45. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 15:42:57 -0500; -- Well, it really depends on the situation, and on the nature of the car in question. For me, lag isn't normally an issue, but it IS there. Case in point: The turnaround in Ft Myers. When I did it r; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01325.html (11,280 bytes)
46. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 15:45:51 -0500; Which puts you at about even (or a little less) with the other cars in ESP, doesn't it? Sam: What does a built-to-the-max Camarobird make at the flywheel, 350? DG; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01326.html (9,010 bytes)
47. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Fedja Jeleskovic" <Fedja_Jeleskovic@pictel.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 16:00:51 -0500; That is exactly why I wrote it this way Well, there are a lot's of cars around and I guess we can make a lot's of different examples. I will make just one. Type R and Turbo DSM. 195 HP from 1.8 litt; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01329.html (12,024 bytes)
48. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 13:15:11 -0800; No, no, no -- I was being responsive to YOUR point, which was to allow no mods to the turbo but allow mods to the boost controls. The SVO in stock trim makes 15 psi, and there's not much worth doing; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01332.html (9,773 bytes)
49. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 16:32:06 -0500; ...yeah, so add a boost controller, make 20PSI (and ~300HP) and now you've got a fighting chance. Although 100 HP from a 5PSI boost difference seems more than a little excessive - what's the displac; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01335.html (9,199 bytes)
50. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 18:45:55 -0500; I give up. I'm not arguing fair, unfair. Just trying to give my view point on what the SEB is thinking about. A Type R has no torque, you do, but I don't see them complaining since you out power and; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01353.html (12,005 bytes)
51. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "David Hawkins" <otgrouch@twosrus.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 18:19:25 -0600; run to the Where, in ANY of my words, did you read THAT? What I said was that one car has been built the extent of the rules and proven to be a possible overdog. Make that one move to another class.; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01361.html (9,431 bytes)
52. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:47:19 -0500; (Cutting and pasting from several posts, attribution may be screwed up) Except that a hard boost limit (as a rule) doesn't work for anybody. Firstly, there is no blanket rule that says that 1 PSI of; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01402.html (12,626 bytes)
53. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Fedja Jeleskovic" <Fedja_Jeleskovic@pictel.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 10:37:56 -0500; Yes, but you don't have to launch SS Camaro or Mustang from 4000+ RPMs as turbo cars (you are missing our famous lag). Most of the pony cars will burn a lot of rubber just by flooring it even from th; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01410.html (9,029 bytes)
54. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 13:14:45 -0500; There isn't a legal ESP pony car out there that will snap tires loose in 2nd gear. What you obviously don't realize is the Supra was bogged badly promptly BEFORE it left all that BFG rubber on the gr; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01422.html (10,054 bytes)
55. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 13:57:29 -0800; I know a LEGAL ESP 2nd gen Firebird that'll do just that. .030" over SD-455, M-22 4spd, and a 3.73 rear. Put him in 2nd gear and he'll light'em up anywhere you like for about as long as you like. It; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01430.html (9,411 bytes)
56. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Fedja Jeleskovic" <Fedja_Jeleskovic@pictel.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 14:04:42 -0500; I really don't know where did you get this one from. I drove few and I was driven in some of them and they can burn those tires at will. They where all manual though, and that makes a lot of differe; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01432.html (10,805 bytes)
57. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 14:37:01 -0500; Okay, whadda I know about f-bodies...... You can spin the tires in a Neon in 2nd gear if you shift it and nail it. I'm talking about rolling along and standing on it. This is not the same coming out; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01435.html (11,664 bytes)
58. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 11:32:24 -0800; There's no way my '94 ESP Z28 (six-speed) would do more than briefly chirp tires on a hard redline shift into second gear. Sure, if the rear wheels are sliding sideways already when you get on the g; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01436.html (8,691 bytes)
59. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 15:30:43 -0800; Ummm..... A DSM is more like 3000-3200 ('95-up) and it's the '95-up cars that seem to be more prevelent/competitive for other technical reasons (power steering?). Mike; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01442.html (7,973 bytes)
60. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Fedja Jeleskovic" <Fedja_Jeleskovic@pictel.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 15:59:07 -0500; Well, it is more like 3200-3300 for the 95+ DSMs. Pre-95 cars are a bit lighter (100 pounds or so) Fedja; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01446.html (8,433 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3]