Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SP\s+rules\s+on\s+catalytic\s+converters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SP\s+rules\s+on\s+catalytic\s+converters\s*$/: 60 ]

Total 60 documents matching your query.

21. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "David Hawkins" <otgrouch@twosrus.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 18:22:45 -0600; I have to ask, then...isn't this the case NOW? The MR2 Turbo and RX-7 TII run in ASP. The RX-7TT runs there, but hey, you can't put it any higher. The DSM Turbo runs in ESP with the Supra....against; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01213.html (10,520 bytes)
22. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:49:21 -0500; As a turbo guy, it sure doesn't feel that way. Instead, it feels like once again those "evil turbo people" have been singled out for "special" treatment. Here's a question I have for the SEB and anyo; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01272.html (14,332 bytes)
23. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:21:27 -0600; -- This would probably be most "fair" as you would be able to run your full flow potential. You are limited by the turbo physics when it comes down to it. Protesting: If the turbo has the stock casi; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01277.html (9,656 bytes)
24. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "David Hawkins" <otgrouch@twosrus.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:25:19 -0600; Prepared? fix. Every time I ask this question, I get the same answer....it all points to ONE particular ESP Supra that supposedly is putting down close to 400HP. I have to ask how far this is off of; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01279.html (10,881 bytes)
25. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "David Hawkins" <otgrouch@twosrus.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:29:49 -0600; While this is true, I have yet to see a turbo modded with a bigger wheel that did not have the inlet casing milled out to accommodate the greater flow characteristics of the new compressor. This is; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01280.html (9,502 bytes)
26. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 07:33:10 -0800; Well said. Certainly my turbocar, which when built to the ESP limits (which it is anything but) would put out about 230-250 hp in a 3000 pound car, and would be in no danger (certainly not with this; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01282.html (12,056 bytes)
27. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:03:31 -0500; A pretty fair amount. I think an LS1 car with headers etc. could put out 20-30 more than stock. An L98 car ain't close, we couldn't legally get 300. But, that really has nothing to do with it. Fact i; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01285.html (11,154 bytes)
28. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:00:36 -0500; The important point to note here is that now we're talking about milling metal off a part in order to cheat. This means that now, in order to cheat with a turbo, we're talking about doing something; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01286.html (10,266 bytes)
29. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:18:22 -0700; -- I can guarantee an ESP legal Supra, will NOT DO 400Hp at the wheels. Most of these cars without boost control will lay down 290-320Hp...thats it. I have seen the extremely rare MK4 on a dyno, tha; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01288.html (9,632 bytes)
30. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 10:19:55 -0600; -- I had the turbos on our Stealth TT upgraded with a more agressive compressor wheel without machine work. I was able then to peg 20psi constantly instead of maybe banging on it once on a cold morn; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01289.html (9,771 bytes)
31. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 10:55:20 -0600; -- But once you get it in a straight line..instant-on torque. You dont get that in a turbo car at 8.x:1 compression and tons of lag. Parity. You cant turn, I cant instantly GO.; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01297.html (9,510 bytes)
32. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: Pat MacAvoy <patmac@tridelta.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:25:57 -0500 (EST); <<SNIP>> So, I can't change my wastegate spring, but I have to make something to decrease the pressure seen by the wastegate? Anybody have a wastegate proportioning valve?????? If you were to do thi; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01298.html (11,003 bytes)
33. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:16:58 -0500; Just pointing out the fact people overlook obvious things like handling one power comes into the equation........ But, I do have to argue that a turbo car can't go as well out of a corner as a NA car; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01299.html (9,800 bytes)
34. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: SlyFoxRc@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:22:05 EST; << I can guarantee an ESP legal Supra, will NOT DO 400Hp at the wheels. >> Not many of any cars lay down 400hp at the wheels. Mostly figures are figured at the flywheel, run it throught the gearbox a; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01301.html (9,057 bytes)
35. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:44:25 -0600; Upgraded compressor bypass valves (BOVs) were outlawed last year. WHY..nobody can tell me. (Another magic Turbo trick I guess) Correct?; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01302.html (8,885 bytes)
36. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:47:34 -0600; -- Of course, Ive found most Mk4s to be about 16% loss thru the drivetrain on OEM fluids.; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01304.html (9,242 bytes)
37. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 13:41:14 -0500; Oh, that I didn't know. I can see why. It's something that there is no equivilent for on a normally aspirated engine. If it does nothing and was outlawed then who cares? People tend only to get upset; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01308.html (9,990 bytes)
38. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Pickrell Jr." <brnrubr@midusa.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:30:29 -0600; I had planned to stay out of this, but since you insist. The Supra in queston trophied with a cone on every single run. That statement should stand on its own. However, lest you think it was all driv; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01309.html (12,647 bytes)
39. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:02:19 -0700; -- True, but if a vehicle has a BOV thats in adequate, then an upgrade should be allowed. The fact is, that there is no non-turbo equal to KILL response like a badly designed (or lack of) BOV. A BOV; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01312.html (10,136 bytes)
40. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Fedja Jeleskovic" <Fedja_Jeleskovic@pictel.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 14:07:16 -0500; everyone can That is something that I agree with. There is not equal on the non-turbo. But this point of view where you taking non-turbo cars as a "normal" (or primary) cars and turbo cars as someth; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01314.html (10,434 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]