Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Kumho\s+225\/50\-14\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Kumho 225/50-14? (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 09:35:41 -0600
Any word yet on whether or not Kumho actually _is_ gonna make this 225/50-14 tire? And if so, when will it be available? If/when it does become available will it immediately be legal to use for Solo
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00343.html (7,869 bytes)

2. re: Kumho 225/50-14? (score: 1)
Author: Dave Hillman <hillman@enteract.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 16:00:42 -0600 (CST)
Eric Linnhoff wrote... Vilven Tire/CUT guaranteed us they will *not* be selling any 225/50/14 V700s this year. That addition to the product line has been postponed until next year, due to the economi
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00373.html (7,714 bytes)

3. re: Kumho 225/50-14? (score: 1)
Author: "Howard, Brent" <Brent.Howard@searbrown.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 17:04:00 -0500
Hope this wasn't covered already, but I got a little behind on the digests and just skimmed through most of them, but this subject caught my eye. I saw the conflicting reports as to whether or not th
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00558.html (8,026 bytes)

4. RE: Kumho 225/50-14? (score: 1)
Author: "Moore, John" <jmoore@spyglass.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 10:52:50 -0600
Just for comparison purposes, the 225/50-15 BFG is 8.4" tread where the Kumho is 8.66". When talking 205/55-14, then the BFG is 7.1" and the Kumho is a whopping 7.64". Major differences and I would e
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00570.html (9,042 bytes)

5. RE: Kumho 225/50-14? (score: 1)
Author: Arie Villasol <ariel@addisgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 99 09:36:13 -0000
Has anyone compared the width's of 225 Kumhos to the 225 Hoosier radials?? Just curious. Thanks! -Arie Villasol '72 Komush Capri (DSP) '68 MGB (DSP
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00580.html (7,299 bytes)

6. RE: Kumho 225/50-14? (score: 1)
Author: "Moore, John" <jmoore@spyglass.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 12:07:23 -0600
225/45-15 Hoosier Radial is 8.8" Tread width, 225/55-125 Hoosier Radial is 8.5", 225/50-15 Kumho is 8.66" and 225/50-15 BFG R1 is 8.4". Don't know the width of a BFG G-Force since I don't have that c
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00582.html (7,830 bytes)

7. Re: Kumho 225/50-14? (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 13:21:19 -0500
Are you comparing apples to apples? What exactly are these numbers? Is this the width of the tread that touches the ground when the tire is mounted on a reference rim (how wide?), inflated to referen
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00583.html (8,375 bytes)

8. RE: Kumho 225/50-14? (score: 1)
Author: "Moore, John" <jmoore@spyglass.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 12:54:45 -0600
[Moore, John] I just gave some basic number for comparison. You want the full story, then go out to the TireRack sight and look for yourself. For those who may not have web access, here goes more of
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00585.html (11,547 bytes)

9. re: Kumho 225/50-14? (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Cashmore <cashmo@execpc.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 19:48:17 -0600
"I saw the conflicting reports as to whether or not the 225/50-14's will be built. Do any Neonites have any idea if they will fit on our cars?" Right now, I'd have to doubt it. The new Kumho (and G-F
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00627.html (7,746 bytes)

10. Re: Kumho 225/50-14? (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 23:28:56 -0800
== Yes. 225/50-14 RA1s up front and 205/55-14 RA1s out back. Both on 14"x6" AR24s. Treadwidths (measured from where the sidewall meets the usable tread surface)are: 225's = 9 3/8" 205's = 8 5/8" Hei
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00646.html (8,142 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu