Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Flip\s+Over\s+at\s+Route\s+666\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Flip\s+Over\s+at\s+Route\s+666\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: Popsracr@aol.com; Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 18:34:53 EDT; OK fellow netters the latest from the Chicago Region. Camaro flipped over today at what was an incredibly fast race course designed into the two access roads at the Route 66 raceway in Joliet, Illino; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00014.html (9,018 bytes)
2. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 18:39:16 -0500; Glad no one got hurt! This is the kind of thing I fear happening at our site near Minneapolis. It is not a dedicated raceway, however, so an occurance like this could jeopardize the site. I don't kno; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00015.html (8,606 bytes)
3. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: Popsracr@aol.com; Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 22:18:54 EDT; Not sure if it's actually SCCA approved for Solo 2 but since we've run there last summer I'd assume it is (of course I could be wrong). Jim Harn; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00024.html (7,860 bytes)
4. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: Mark Praner <whitemr2@megsinet.net>; Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 22:37:31 -0500; I was there This track was insanely fast I think in my 91 N/A mr2 i was reaching speeds up to 85mph it was too fast to do anything. No wonder why the vette smacked into the concrete barrier. access w; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00027.html (10,204 bytes)
5. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: Loren Williams <lsw@southwind.net>; Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 23:39:01 -0500; I've seen several different people post on this event, at least two of them were there. Apparently a T/A bit the grass and rolled over... AND a 'Vette smacked a wall. Everyone keeps saying how insane; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00033.html (8,536 bytes)
6. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: "George Ryan" <quad4fiero@webzone.net>; Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 06:20:02 -0500; Jim Ham satated he was not sure whether this was a sanctioned SCCA event, but thought it was. The course clearly did not meet the SCCA's guidelines. A SSS should have intervened, if it was in fact he; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00034.html (10,385 bytes)
7. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 07:36:49 -0500; There are lots-o-clubs running stuff, so I didn't want to assume it was an SCCA event. Shouldn't matter...this course was clearly (based on the information I have, I was not there) too fast and quite; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00035.html (9,166 bytes)
8. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: Mike Bultemeier <hottvr@tfs.net>; Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 07:45:43 -0500; Just my two cents. Somethings are better left unsaid, maybe this is one of Don't say anything in this forum that you don't want the whole world to know. I'm not directing this at any one person, just; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00036.html (11,574 bytes)
9. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: Scott & Glenda Meyers <autox@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 07:59:37 -0700; Big time here.... If it was, there should be either sanctions or an investigation by National - this type of incident could affect more than just this area. It would be good to be able to say "SCCA w; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00045.html (8,987 bytes)
10. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: Chris Sims <csims@simshome.com>; Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 10:17:14 -0700 (PDT); <snip> This is just too fast for Solo2. I feel that this crosses the line between safe fast fun and dangerous. Just my 2 cents. . . Chris ** * * * Chris Sims * * http://www.simshome.com * * * **; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00067.html (9,418 bytes)
11. RE: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: Tom Gentry <tgentry@execpc.com>; Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 12:21:03 -0500; Yet, not one post from someone who decided to leave rather than run, or at least complained to the organizers. Things that make you go "Hmmmmmmmm". I saw an area that I thought could be easily made; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00068.html (9,200 bytes)
12. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: Mark Praner <whitemr2@megsinet.net>; Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 12:48:36 -0500; Well we only got 3 runs at this SCCA event Sunday because they cancelled the rest of the event so we got 2 heats in thats it. We finished the 2nd heat at 4:30 i believe it was. This is how poorly the; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00076.html (10,518 bytes)
13. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 15:39:03 -0400; <<<Just my two cents. Somethings are better left unsaid, maybe this is one of them? Don't say anything in this forum that you don't want the whole world to know. I'm not directing this at any one per; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00082.html (8,847 bytes)
14. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: TeamZ3@aol.com; Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 18:36:19 EDT; I strongly believe that the vast majority of autocrossers disagree with this statement, including myself. If we weren't worried about physical damage, or the cost thereof, many of us would be getting; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00094.html (9,543 bytes)
15. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: Benjamin D Thatcher <bthatch@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 06:56:03 -0400; Don't get me wrong. I don't want to be chairing an event where even property damage happens. I want to do everything I can to keep that from happening. The point of my post on the incidents at Rt 66; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00120.html (9,196 bytes)
16. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: GSMnow@aol.com; Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 11:16:01 EDT; << Here we go again, people who weren't at the event jumping to huge conclusions about the safety of an event they know nothing about. >> I was there, but not when the car flipped, I was towing mine; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00132.html (13,286 bytes)
17. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: Paul Czarnecki <oblique@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 12:38:44 -0400; Interestingly enough, last time I read the SCCA wavier, it said if you think the site is unsafe you are required to leave the site (after informing officials of course). Now this may be namby pamby l; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00137.html (9,451 bytes)
18. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: Mike Bultemeier <hottvr@tfs.net>; Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 11:55:16 -0500; Leave? Maybe not run but leave? No way, if its that dangerous I'm sticking around for the heavy carnage. Its just a joke, a little sick but still a joke Mike B. TLS#1; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00138.html (9,077 bytes)
19. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 16:08:15 -0400; <<<Here we go again, people who weren't at the event jumping to huge conclusions about the safety of an event they know nothing about.>>> Here we go again stating that everything was just hunky-dory; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00148.html (8,641 bytes)
20. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: Benjamin D Thatcher <bthatch@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 16:38:13 -0400; I sez Ben; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00150.html (8,860 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]