Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*First\s+draft\s+of\s+my\s+proposed\s+C\&C\s+re\-write\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: First draft of my proposed C&C re-write (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Brown" <free2000@quixnet.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 18:57:43 -0700
I don't get this part, what's the point of having to leave the original mirror? You don't use the mirror while autocrossing (at least you shouldn't be). The Wink probably weighs as much or more. I s
/html/autox/2000-06/msg00292.html (8,267 bytes)

2. Re: First draft of my proposed C&C re-write (score: 1)
Author: "Arthur Emerson" <vreihen@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 19:28:30 PDT
Someplace, in a dusty garage, rests an antique sports car that's older than all of us, with a rear-view mirror attached to the dashboard. This guy can put a mirror up higher, provided that he doesn't
/html/autox/2000-06/msg00299.html (9,032 bytes)

3. Re: First draft of my proposed C&C re-write (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 23:06:56 -0400
You've obviously never driven a BMW M Coupe. Or you've never been a tall driver in a Miata. The mirror definitely blocks a significant amount of the driver's vision in some cars, for some drivers. Re
/html/autox/2000-06/msg00303.html (7,782 bytes)

4. RE: First draft of my proposed C&C re-write (score: 1)
Author: "Glen E. Thompson" <glen.thompson@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 23:21:40 -0400
Pretty good for a 1st draft. Thanks for the effort. One potential problem area deals with older and restored cars. They usually don't have original upholstery or carpets. The rules, as written, seem
/html/autox/2000-06/msg00306.html (13,668 bytes)

5. Re: First draft of my proposed C&C re-write (score: 1)
Author: Mike Lamfalusi <lamfalus@excite.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 21:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
In the case of a rear view mirror in the way of vision, wouldn't it be better for the safety of the driver and anyone else involved if the driver had a clear field of view? I almost see this as a saf
/html/autox/2000-06/msg00318.html (9,229 bytes)

6. Re: First draft of my proposed C&C re-write (score: 1)
Author: "Jeffrey Lloyd" <jeff@cyberconceptz.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 01:12:35 -0700
The M coupe mirror falls under the "not able to be held permently by factory fasteners" rule I don't know about every other Z3 driver but every time i Reach to put up my (non removeable) passanger su
/html/autox/2000-06/msg00319.html (8,640 bytes)

7. Re: First draft of my proposed C&C re-write (score: 1)
Author: "Jeffrey Lloyd" <jeff@cyberconceptz.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 01:44:54 -0700
or there is the option, in case you heppen to reach up and knock ito off right as your stagiung well you just have to snap it on before you reach the impound PS. I don't support loose interpertation
/html/autox/2000-06/msg00322.html (8,502 bytes)

8. Re: First draft of my proposed C&C re-write (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 11:22:44 -0400
Eh? You lost me there. You seem to think that "leveling the playing field" means "making all cars alike." Since GS Integra Type R's are lighter than other GS cars, should all GS cars be able to be ma
/html/autox/2000-06/msg00367.html (8,267 bytes)

9. Re: First draft of my proposed C&C re-write (score: 1)
Author: Mike Lamfalusi <lamfalus@excite.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 10:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Whatever, leveling the playing field, safety, I don't care how or why you allow it. I've driven an M Coupe and to say that the mirror obstructs your view is an understatement. If nothing else, everyo
/html/autox/2000-06/msg00387.html (9,575 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu