autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: First draft of my proposed C&C re-write

To: free2000@quixnet.net, vreihen@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: First draft of my proposed C&C re-write
From: "Arthur Emerson" <vreihen@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 19:28:30 PDT
"Rick Brown" <free2000@quixnet.net> wrote:
>
> > [New paragraphs]
>
> >    N.  The installation of an additional mirror (e.g. a "Wink")
> >        is permitted, provided that the original mirror is not
> >        removed.
>
>I don't get this part, what's the point of having to leave the original 
>mirror?

Someplace, in a dusty garage, rests an antique sports car
that's older than all of us, with a rear-view mirror attached
to the dashboard.  This guy can put a mirror up higher, provided
that he doesn't remove the original mirror from the dashboard.

>The Wink probably weighs as much or more.

The rule says "a" mirror, for example a Wink.  One of those
$0.99 Wal-Mart sticky tape fish eye mirrors also qualifies.
If you allowed the removal of the old mirror, one could
theoretically replace a monster, self-dimming electronic
rearview that weighs several pounds with a $0.99 fish eye
that is not only unuseable as a mirror but stuck to the head
liner of the car and not in the driver's field of vision.

>If this isn't C&C what is?

The current published last sentence of 13.2.A (C&C) says
just what I wrote, only I took the liberty of breaking
it out into a seperate paragraph and saying exactly the
same thing in three less words.

You now see why C&C needs to be clarified.....

-Arthur ("Verbs 'R Us" edition.)

________________________________________________________________________


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>