Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Axle\s+ratio\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Axle\s+ratio\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Axle ratio (score: 1): Author: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:50:26 -0500; All other things being equal, for an autocross, would one prefer a 3.82 or 3.9 axle ratio? TYIA, Matt Murray mailto:mattm@optonline.net mailto:mdmurray@gwns.com; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00937.html (6,845 bytes)
2. Re: Axle ratio (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 06:59:06 -0800; That's a tough question. In my mind it would depend on where the 3.9 put you at the top of second. If the car has solid accelleration to start with, I would take the longer legs. If it could use some; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00940.html (7,092 bytes)
3. Re: Axle ratio (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 11:14:54 -0500; It's unfortunately not that simple. (1) At what speed would you hit the rev limiter in each gear with each axle ratio? Would the 3.9 necessitate enough shifts to third (and back down to second) that; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00944.html (7,246 bytes)
4. RE: Axle ratio (score: 1): Author: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:16:07 -0700; Forget that, be a man, go for the 4.11 posi....he he Jason Isley jisley@cell1.com It's unfortunately not that simple. (1) At what speed would you hit the rev limiter in each gear with each axle ratio; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00946.html (7,522 bytes)
5. Re: Axle ratio (score: 1): Author: John Lieberman <johnlee@softdisk.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 16:50:27 -0600; Simple question, Matt. But, like Andy and Mark said, the answer is not quite as simple. In general, a lower ratio (higher number) will give you better acceleration. But you run out of gear in a hurry; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00963.html (8,986 bytes)
6. Re: Axle ratio (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 22:38:40 -0600; 3.9. Unless of course, you are always hitting the top of second just a bit too much short of the end of the straight. Phil Ethier Saint Paul Minnesota USA 1970 Lotus Europa, 1992 Saturn SL2, 1986 Che; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00982.html (7,301 bytes)
7. Re: Axle Ratio (score: 1): Author: JAC73@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 08:57:18 -0500; Matt Murray Asked: Well... it depends. Can you handle 102% of the propshaft revs at your chosen vehicle speed without overrevving the engine (or falling off the end of the power curve) in the transmi; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00989.html (7,082 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]