Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AP\s+proposal\s+in\s+NAP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AP\s+proposal\s+in\s+NAP\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. AP proposal in NAP (score: 1): Author: pethier@isd.net; Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 21:23:01 -0600; Just a few details, please. I just read the A Prepared proposal in NAP. I ran the numbers and the minimum weight for my Europa would be 1544.3 pounds. This is more than the car weighs stock. Are thes; /html/autox/2005-03/msg00042.html (7,233 bytes)
2. Re: AP proposal in NAP (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>; Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:18:01 -0500; Without, as is indicated in that same section of the proposal. Right, but a built AP car will likely be putting out considerably more power from a motor of the same size. Like, probably double. Yes.; /html/autox/2005-03/msg00044.html (8,001 bytes)
3. Re: AP proposal in NAP (score: 1): Author: pethier@isd.net; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:56:51 -0600; Mark! You cured my blindness! I agree with the writer in the NAP this month that weighing without the driver unfairly penalizes both light cars and heavy drivers. Hmm, so no breaks for pushrod engin; /html/autox/2005-03/msg00046.html (7,952 bytes)
4. Re: AP proposal in NAP (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:21:55 -0500; Right. That's true in every class that has minimum weights that weighs without driver (all of Prepared). That's why the MAC pushed through weighing with driver for DM/EM. The AP Committee wanted to s; /html/autox/2005-03/msg00049.html (7,916 bytes)
5. Re: AP proposal in NAP (score: 1): Author: pethier@isd.net; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:35:06 -0600; I'm sorry. I meant to say "if your old Lotus has no headliner." :-) Phil Ethier; /html/autox/2005-03/msg00054.html (6,946 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]