Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*10yr\s+Stock\s+Class\s+Ruling\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*10yr\s+Stock\s+Class\s+Ruling\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. 10yr Stock Class Ruling (score: 1): Author: Autox86300ZX@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 15:53:11 EDT; After reading all about what should and shouldn't be done, I needed to put my two cents in on this debate. Even though I am not a regular at the Solo II Nationals, I have been to several of them. If,; /html/autox/2002-05/msg00079.html (11,140 bytes)
2. Re: 10yr Stock Class Ruling (score: 1): Author: "Joe Lee Jr." <joeleejr@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 13:08:15 -0700 (PDT); Hear hear! i too am on the board of another (competing?) group - NASA. We would feel terrible for the local SCCA regions if they did this. Too, WHY do it? To make the idiots in $35k 2002 models feel; /html/autox/2002-05/msg00080.html (13,561 bytes)
3. Re: 10yr Stock Class Ruling (score: 1): Author: Alan Dahl <adahl@eskimo.com>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 13:27:51 -0700; I think there is a misunderstanding here. The intent is not to eliminate anyone but rather to have different preparation levels for cars less than 7 years old and built in 2004 and later (totally bon; /html/autox/2002-05/msg00081.html (9,470 bytes)
4. Re: 10yr Stock Class Ruling (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 16:58:16 -0400 (EDT); As someone recently said here... this seems to me to be a solution looking for a problem. A critical difference between roadracing and autox is that when you roadrace you nearly always have a dedica; /html/autox/2002-05/msg00083.html (9,730 bytes)
5. Re: 10yr Stock Class Ruling (score: 1): Author: "Rick Cone" <rickcone@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 17:20:05 -0400; Look, I haven't added it up but I can't believe out of 1200 competitors that 700 are in Stock cars that fall out of th 10 year rule. Get real. my the like went in fees, increase may ones out Field o; /html/autox/2002-05/msg00085.html (13,313 bytes)
6. Re: 10yr Stock Class Ruling (score: 1): Author: "Rick Cone" <rickcone@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 17:26:41 -0400; So stick our head in the sand and do nothing to improve competition/reduce barriers ($$$) of entry in our sport? try /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// ht; /html/autox/2002-05/msg00088.html (11,166 bytes)
7. Re: 10yr Stock Class Ruling (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 17:40:41 -0400 (EDT); No, quit trying to spin what I said into what you'd like it to say. You could summarize my position as this: "If, after examination of a new idea, the idea is not clearly better than what we current; /html/autox/2002-05/msg00089.html (9,117 bytes)
8. Re: 10yr Stock Class Ruling (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 15:24:59 -0700 (PDT); It's abundantly clear that people are not interested in this concept; because their reaction is violent enough that they don't bother to read, understand, or address the notion that I was presenting.; /html/autox/2002-05/msg00091.html (13,651 bytes)
9. Re: 10yr Stock Class Ruling (score: 1): Author: Lee <racergt@xmission.com>; Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 16:56:28 -0600; Showroom stock on RACE TIRES? Never seen a new car in a showroom for sale with race tires. Older cars can be modified to go faster but CAN'T have race tires? What am I missing here? Is this just to m; /html/autox/2002-05/msg00092.html (10,046 bytes)
10. Re: 10yr Stock Class Ruling (score: 1): Author: Ignasi Palou-Rivera <palou@highstream.net>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 18:58:07 -0400; These threatening tone is totally out of place. People have called the ideas all those names you mention, but averybody has been very careful not to say anything about the people voicing those ideas.; /html/autox/2002-05/msg00093.html (9,696 bytes)
11. Re: 10yr Stock Class Ruling (score: 1): Author: "Joe Lee Jr." <joeleejr@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 16:08:28 -0700 (PDT); What is the general opinion on something as simple as this? A linear class system, mods free but accrue points. Bear in mind that with our entries limited to 80 competitors we need limited Classing s; /html/autox/2002-05/msg00094.html (8,919 bytes)
12. Re: 10yr Stock Class Ruling (score: 1): Author: Scott Troyer - TestEng DRAM Repair <stroyer@micron.com>; Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 17:27:17 -0600; /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/autox/2002-05/msg00095.html (8,904 bytes)
13. Re: 10yr Stock Class Ruling (score: 1): Author: "Joe Lee Jr." <joeleejr@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 16:33:23 -0700 (PDT); LOL - It's a European way of saying Class ... our Regional Director was puttin' on airs"! == Joe Lee Jr. "If your car feels like it's on rails, you're not driving fast enough." Yahoo! Health - your g; /html/autox/2002-05/msg00096.html (9,363 bytes)
14. RE: 10yr Stock Class Ruling (score: 1): Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 19:46:15 -0500; --Original Message-- What is the general opinion on something as simple as this? A linear class system, mods free but accrue points. <snip> http://www.nasanortheast.net/rules.shtml == That's similar; /html/autox/2002-05/msg00098.html (8,843 bytes)
15. Re: 10yr Stock Class Ruling (score: 1): Author: "Rand E" <rande@mwis.net>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 23:27:36 -0500; According to last years results listed at http://www.scca.org/amateur/solo2/nationals/2001/index.html There were 429 entries in stock classes. 99 of those were 1992 or older vehicles. So, 23% of the; /html/autox/2002-05/msg00105.html (15,831 bytes)
16. Re: 10yr Stock Class Ruling (score: 1): Author: Bob Pariza <bpariza@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 06:59:51 -0700 (PDT); Here, here! I couldn't agree more! There isn't a classing system or set of rules that everyone is gonna be happy with. No matter what you do someone is going to be upset with how it shakes out. If th; /html/autox/2002-05/msg00111.html (9,775 bytes)
17. Re: 10yr Stock Class Ruling (score: 1): Author: "Cheryl and Jim Fossum" <fossum@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 10:16:32 -0400; Hmmm, how about: Race springs (2pts) Non-adjustable race shocks (2 pts) Camber plates (2 pts) Race slicks (4 pts) Gutted interior (3 pts) Lightweight body panels (2 pts) Stock motor and drivetrain T; /html/autox/2002-05/msg00116.html (8,297 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]