To: | <autox@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: 10yr Stock Class Ruling |
From: | "Cheryl and Jim Fossum" <fossum@charter.net> |
Date: | Sat, 4 May 2002 10:16:32 -0400 |
>What is the general opinion on something as simple as this? ... >http://www.nasanortheast.net/rules.shtml Hmmm, how about: Race springs (2pts) Non-adjustable race shocks (2 pts) Camber plates (2 pts) Race slicks (4 pts) Gutted interior (3 pts) Lightweight body panels (2 pts) Stock motor and drivetrain Total = 15 pts. This doesn't move me up a gruppe right? Probem with this type of structure is there are too many loopholes to exploit when the competition gets really tight. I agree it works much better than the SCCA system for classifying vehicles that aren't built with the rules in mind. -Jim Fossum /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Lime Rock Time Trials, larryb |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Saturday at CU, Matt Murray |
Previous by Thread: | Re: 10yr Stock Class Ruling, Bob Pariza |
Next by Thread: | RE: ax-digest V1 #851, Robert D. LaMoreaux |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |