Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:strano@stranoparts.com: 174 ]

Total 174 documents matching your query.

141. Re: Kumho Sam and BFJoe (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 20:55:25 -0400
I know *nothing*. What's that amendment???? The 5th???? I plead it. Teaching McKamey schools requires I run on alternate tire brands. Yeah, that's it. On the other hand, perhaps I would raz BFJoe if
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00155.html (6,978 bytes)

142. Re: KYB AGX shocks? (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 12:16:32 -0400
GAB and KYB are *not* the same company. KYB was building GAB's, nothing more. From what we can tell, they are copies of the GAB's, but aren't available for all the same cars. Evidentally GAB's patent
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00592.html (6,990 bytes)

143. Re: 89 corvette steering rack (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 16:09:36 -0400
Well, turn your wheel and see how many it is lock to lock. I believe all Z51's got a 2.0 turn rack, and the softer ones were more like 2.5's..... At least the last one I did (an 87 Z51 had a 2.0 rack
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00659.html (6,922 bytes)

144. Re: How to order Kumhos from CUT (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 17:00:54 -0400
Well, CUT's phone number is 888-77-KUMHO. I don't know what the number you had is. CUT's regular phone number is 217-583-3244. Sam Strano Jr. Strano Performance Parts 800-729-1831 814-849-3417 (tech.
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00894.html (6,884 bytes)

145. Re: SP Proposal (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 16:58:06 -0500
Who wouldn't with the list down there!!!! But, I doubt you *need* all of that stuff. I'm sure GAB's or Koni's would be just fine with a little work. I bet some 17x9's would work with from BBS or some
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00150.html (10,031 bytes)

146. lookin' for Mark Andy (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 14:27:14 -0400
Subject sez it all. Sam Strano Jr. Strano Performance Parts 800-729-1831 814-849-3417 (tech.) www.stranoparts.com
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00474.html (6,234 bytes)

147. Re: R/T sits higher with Konis? (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1999 19:55:01 -0400
Everyone told me that it was because of the gas pressure. If it were just plain hydraulics , it would be at normal height! I think there are a couple of things that folks miss here. The first is that
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00551.html (8,493 bytes)

148. Re: McKamey: tire choice (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 10:58:43 -0400
Well, like anything else it's a matter of degrees. Want to learn all you can? Then you run the car the way you run the car. Saving money, and learning don't go together real well. I mean if you softe
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00717.html (8,960 bytes)

149. Re: ProSolo Expo Cancelled (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 15:40:48 -0400
Doesn't surprise me. Oklahoma ain't exaclty what I would consider a hot-bed of autoxing, and that's in the middle of nowhere for a non-points event. Kinda wondered how the whole thing came about anyw
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00898.html (7,879 bytes)

150. Re: ProSolo Expo Cancelled (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 15:52:02 -0400
Now, now. Calm down. My point was there wasn't any incentive for me (and probably a lot of others) to drive to Oklahoma for an event that didn't pay points or money. Add that to the fact SCCA is disa
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00903.html (8,177 bytes)

151. Re: ProSolo Expo Cancelled (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 18:30:09 -0400
Wow, aren't we touchy. I said it seems to me............ Maybe I'm wrong. But my point was they would've had a hell of a lot better chance if it was a real event. Everyone is sooooo touchy. Sheeh. Sa
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00927.html (10,265 bytes)

152. Re: ProSolo Expo Cancelled (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 20:10:42 -0400
I think you have me *really* confused with someone else. The only problem I have with Turbos is when a factory boost limiter is circumvented. Sam Strano Jr. Strano Performance Parts 800-729-1831 814-
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00931.html (8,784 bytes)

153. Re: The tire thing^n (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 15:04:57 -0400
reengineer it's autox only early ninties never a simple to FWIW, under this "rule", any Kumho less than 15" in diameter would be illegal. They are *only* V-rated tires. Furhermore the 226 could have
/html/autox/1999-04/msg01197.html (9,189 bytes)

154. Re: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:03:31 -0500
A pretty fair amount. I think an LS1 car with headers etc. could put out 20-30 more than stock. An L98 car ain't close, we couldn't legally get 300. But, that really has nothing to do with it. Fact i
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01285.html (11,154 bytes)

155. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:16:58 -0500
Just pointing out the fact people overlook obvious things like handling one power comes into the equation........ But, I do have to argue that a turbo car can't go as well out of a corner as a NA car
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01299.html (9,800 bytes)

156. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 13:41:14 -0500
Oh, that I didn't know. I can see why. It's something that there is no equivilent for on a normally aspirated engine. If it does nothing and was outlawed then who cares? People tend only to get upset
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01308.html (9,990 bytes)

157. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 15:24:46 -0500
If we would take a Well there are many more non-turbo's out there. Turbo cars also make more power from engines that weight less, and are not hurt on big courses (remember I have lots of turbo seat t
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01322.html (11,060 bytes)

158. Re: Rotor change in SP? (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 15:47:47 -0500
First thing you need to know is pads fade, not rotors. Second thing is that ANY rotor in a stock size was never meant to be drilled or slotted. Not designed for it = problems with warping and crackin
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01324.html (8,177 bytes)

159. Re: SP rules and ESP Clarification (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 18:38:42 -0500
Ahhhhh, because a 3rd gen car has a front suspension ADvantage. I've driven both, and had 20+ mph roll-on's in 2nd gear with an LT1, and gotten waxed. Just to prove it, how could a 3rd gen with a the
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01352.html (9,425 bytes)

160. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 18:45:55 -0500
I give up. I'm not arguing fair, unfair. Just trying to give my view point on what the SEB is thinking about. A Type R has no torque, you do, but I don't see them complaining since you out power and
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01353.html (12,005 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu