Mail Archive Search: <+from:stevehh@hiwaay.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:stevehh@hiwaay.net: 61 ]

Total 61 documents matching your query.

41. Looking for a Honda auto recycler (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 22:32:05 -0600; I need some Honda parts and have had trouble locating them locally. Anybody know of a good Honda auto recycler anywhere? Thanks, Steve Hoelscher /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@a; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00344.html (6,828 bytes)
42. Re: [evolution-disc.] Looking for a Honda auto recycler (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 19:59:28 -0600; Thanks to all who replied with sources for me, especially those with phone numbers. I needed the parts ASAP and didn't have the time to wait for return emails. HAP had the parts at a reasonable price; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00352.html (7,542 bytes)
43. Re: [evolution-disc.] Seeking opinions from Left Foot Brakers (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 10:31:03 -0600; I have left foot braked for many years and room in the footwell has not really been a problem. I wear a size 12 and sometimes find the footwells are not tall enough, but I doubt that is your problem.; /html/autox/2002-02/msg00054.html (9,356 bytes)
44. Re: OEM Shock Rules (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 13:13:15 -0600; Sorry Matt, but that isn't exactly the case. If Scotty's shocks are legal OEM shocks, who pays for the analysis of the oil to decide if its the H&C Extra-Groovy stuff or the OEM oil? And the tests wo; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00194.html (8,089 bytes)
45. RE: [evolution-disc.] F-Body question (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 20:20:27 -0600; We get these kinds of problems in my shop regularly. I doubt it is an oil problem unless someone has changed the oil and put the wrong stuff in it. The late model 6 speed manuals all come from GM wi; /html/autox/2001-11/msg00035.html (8,774 bytes)
46. RE: suspected illegalities (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 10:15:14 -0500; You started at the right place by buying a rule book. Much of your question can be answered there. Read section 8 beginning on page 75. You will find the entire process there. However, I should poin; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00102.html (11,294 bytes)
47. RE: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (Rocky's History (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 22:20:36 -0500; I thought Dennis had a pretty good perspective on the whole deal. His post was one of the most logical on the subject I have ever seen on this list and gives a reasonably fair assessment of where we; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00236.html (14,314 bytes)
48. RE: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (Rocky's History (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 12:09:45 -0500; It did, however, work out that Stock>SP was a progression simply because Stock was the base model and SP was the base model with stuff done to it. For that matter, Prepared (originally the GCR Produc; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00242.html (12,250 bytes)
49. RE: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (Rocky's History (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 16:14:07 -0500; With the happy realization that Steve and I really are not in huge disagreement overall... << Except on this point. ;) And I'm not. <sigh> again we must disagree. :-) I am not because there is no pro; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00246.html (12,533 bytes)
50. RE: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (Rocky's History (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 21:35:16 -0500; <<<< Chris, dude, you got it wrong. I now have a fuel injected lawn mower. What you should have said was; ...prepared cars and vintage racers. No wait! That's redundant! ;) Steve Hoelscher /// autox@; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00258.html (9,965 bytes)
51. RE: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (Rocky's History (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 22:24:49 -0500; Rocky Entriken wrote (with considerable passion): Thing is, people -- IT DOES NOT MATTER WHAT THE RULES ARE, IT ONLY MATTERS THAT THERE ARE RULES. <<< My point all along has been that the wheel limit; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00261.html (10,874 bytes)
52. RE: Fuel Injected Prepared Lawn Mowers (was: SP cars to compete (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 22:31:57 -0500; Jeff Wenchell quotes: http://www.letsmow.com/downloads/USLMRA_RuleBook2001.PDF On page 7: "Any apparatus other than carburetor or fuel injector, which can be used to introduce any gaseous or liquid s; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00287.html (8,418 bytes)
53. RE: Fuel Injected Prepared Lawn Mowers (was: SP cars to compete (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 20:38:15 -0500; Perhaps you ought to read the prepared rules a little more carefully. You can run fuel injection if you want, it just (in some forms) incurs a 10% weight penalty. If fuel injection is such the big ad; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00308.html (8,234 bytes)
54. RE: Tech at Nationals (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 17:05:27 -0500; Sorry Colan, but as I understand it, "ALL" does not mean *all*. I offer the 427 Cobra that ran a couple of years ago (before the big accident). The roll bar was clearly below the top of the driver's; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00012.html (11,580 bytes)
55. RE: Tech at Nationals (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 18:07:04 -0500; Yes he does. But then he doesn't meet *all* of the requirements of appendix C either, which was my original point. Steve Hoelscher Then again, Chris O'Donnell's roll bar doesn't meet "all requirement; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00014.html (7,933 bytes)
56. FW: Tech at Nationals (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 21:59:59 -0500; OK, So we go back to the orginal point. The rollbar does not meet *ALL* of the requirements of appendix C, because it is aluminum. It is grandfathered in under a statement that is part of appendix C; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00018.html (9,707 bytes)
57. RE: The Announcement Last Tuesday (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 21:32:20 -0500; As I am sure you have already guessed, I am in disagreement regarding the announcement. Please understand that I am not angry with you, I assumed your intentions were honorable, just misguided. <<I; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00350.html (10,438 bytes)
58. RE: The Announcement Last Tuesday (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 21:52:45 -0500; Go to the results for Heats one and two find the cars that got slower, then ask those drivers if the announcement effected them.>> Yes, it affected me. Would I have improved if I hadn't been told? We; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00352.html (8,377 bytes)
59. RE: STS Tire Rules (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 12:38:57 -0500; How did I get drug into this mess??? And shouldn't it be me that was But as long as I am here, I might as well use the bandwidth to irritate someone ;) For those that think because Roger doesn't run; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01146.html (11,265 bytes)
60. RE: STS Tire Rules (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hoelscher" <stevehh@hiwaay.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 20:55:25 -0600; I have come to understand what you're saying here (thanks Roger, et. al.), but there's still one thing that's not quite clear to me. How is the Stock/SP "DOT approved" rule any more enforcable than t; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01148.html (11,583 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]