Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rnichol1@san.rr.com: 128 ]

Total 128 documents matching your query.

61. Re: The end of the Turbo era? (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 07:40:15 -0700
Force ALL and Both of your points above are the essence of a recent letter I sent to the SEB (my second so far on the topic). I think you said it well in a lot fewer words than I used! Your and my p
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00174.html (8,537 bytes)

62. Re: AutoX: newbie (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 10:56:57 -0700
As a relative newbie (about 2 years now) who insists on autoxing on street tires, I believe that this view expressed by Charlie is entirely understandable, but misses the point when advising a newbie
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00183.html (10,838 bytes)

63. Re: Asking for ideas... (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 09:53:29 -0700
In the spirit of *constructive* debate, let me say that I undersand where Ray is coming from with his query. Labelling it *whining* is neither fair nor accurate. We don't have to agree or disagree wi
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00320.html (14,374 bytes)

64. Re: Street Tire Handicap (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 10:35:30 -0700
Gonna have to use more critical thinking, guys, when considering others' ideas. "Critical thinking", as in "look beneath the surface". As I understand Ray's original thought, if I may "reflect" what
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00409.html (10,197 bytes)

65. Re: Street Tire Handicap (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 13:21:38 -0700
Jay, I appreciate how your response was responsive to my own points, and I mean that seriously, not sarcastically. :) If you noticed, in my own earlier response to this thread, I said I'd learned eno
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00429.html (13,957 bytes)

66. Re: Out to launch :) (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 09:06:20 -0700
I've been doing this for a couple of years now, and I agree with *everything* Eric has said here, for RWD cars (including my turbocar). He has summed it up nicely. Richard Nichols rnichol1@san.rr.com
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00863.html (9,716 bytes)

67. Re: Rear Seats (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 12:22:01 -0700
And then you would have to wonder if it was *really* worth doing (though I have a complete list of the R updates because of my own Mustang). That kind of weight reduction, especially on a rear drive
/html/autox/1999-05/msg01058.html (9,196 bytes)

68. Re: ST Classification..any solid rules? (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 12:55:16 -0800
Joshua Hadler is right again, as usual. :) To "tee" off his comments on the street tire thread, I've been advocating a class (in addition to S, SP, P, M, ST, etc) that would have the mission to encou
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00045.html (11,663 bytes)

69. IROC, therefore IAM (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 13:05:11 -0800
And while I'm on my soapbox about a Street Legal class -- -- since the List quite rightly emphasizes that driver skill, seat time, etc., needs to be emphasized over equipment, and so-and-so could win
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00046.html (7,958 bytes)

70. Re: ST Classification..any solid rules? (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 14:23:12 -0800
Not if they had to drive their cars to the meets! :) But seriously, there are residency requirements for registering automobiles -- even in Alabama, yes? But point well taken -- it's a loophole that
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00050.html (8,895 bytes)

71. Re: Re-establishing F Prepared (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 07:53:40 -0700
CP also allows turbocars, such as the Mustang Fox bodies -- though, for some reason, not to the level of prep allowed in SP (in CP, though windows and interior can be removed, and any turbo can be us
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00304.html (8,103 bytes)

72. Fw: [rrax-mustang] spliting rotors(long) (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 20:35:53 -0700
A list member on the Mustang list and a racer, could use some help with the following. His message is forwarded with his permission. If you can help him, perhaps you could respond directly to him --
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00376.html (9,390 bytes)

73. San Diego autox prax (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 07:17:27 -0700
Thanks to the San Diego region for organizing a practice this past Saturday that included a novice instruction section! This is a marvelous way to encourage new participation (which, though I've been
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00642.html (7,006 bytes)

74. TSOL (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 09:03:45 -0700
Sure, Scott, we already have a TLS, so why *not* a Team SOL (TSOL). Sign me up for this one (seriously)! :) You have the Yugo, so you can be our leader, and it was your idea anyway. :) And because th
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00725.html (7,866 bytes)

75. Re: Intake mods, what class? (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 17:20:21 -0700
I reread the SP part myself, and I can see why you're confused. Unfortunately I can't tell, either! :) Reading that section, I see we turboguys can run water to air intercoolers now. Cool (you should
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00859.html (8,572 bytes)

76. Re: helmet help! (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 18:31:52 -0700
But, if it doesn't go to the List, how will we avoid lots of duplicate "4.3.A. Helmets "Helmets meeting the following standards must be worn while on course: All helmets meeting the current or two im
/html/autox/1999-04/msg00984.html (7,770 bytes)

77. Re: Street Tire classes (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 10:42:41 -0700
I really appreciate the constructive comments on street tire classes, as its a pet project for me and one that San Diego Region has expressed an interest in exploring more fully. It's clear that it c
/html/autox/1999-04/msg01125.html (9,911 bytes)

78. Re: gearing (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 20:32:20 -0700
You don't have to be a math freak, just pick up a copy of HPBooks' "Auto Math Handbook" for hours of fun. Plug it into a computer spreadsheet and do "what ifs" for combos like this (tire diameters th
/html/autox/1999-04/msg01154.html (7,748 bytes)

79. Re: wheels which ones? (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 21:03:00 -0700
Yup, assuming in your 16x7 example that you're starting with *positive* offset, and you're wanting to increase your track (you mentioned spacers) then positive offset will increase (in your example)
/html/autox/1999-04/msg01441.html (9,166 bytes)

80. Re: BSP Datsun Z questions (score: 1)
Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 09:16:12 -0700
Hopefully this will be taken as the constructive comment it's intended to When at a recent practice in San Diego, which was specifically set up for novices (applause, please!), while working the cour
/html/autox/1999-04/msg01572.html (12,070 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu