Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mattm@optonline.net: 1275 ]

Total 1275 documents matching your query.

21. SEB in the posts (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:28:31 -0500
Apparently, Doug Gill sez the SEB is working on fulfilling the "dead cold hands" part of my request. :^) Matt Murray
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00165.html (6,464 bytes)

22. Re: Street Tires in Stock Classes and Fewer Allowances (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:47:32 -0500
So let's say we go back to non-"R" tires in stock. Would we bring all the ST classes back to stock and remove that whole subset? Matt Murray
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00181.html (9,002 bytes)

23. Re: Street Tires in Stock Classes and Fewer Allowances (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:53:46 -0500
No. Silly idea. Matt Murray Other than Jim, is there anyone else on this list who wants to get rid of R tires in Stock? Alan Pozner --Original Message-- So let's say we go back to non-"R" tires in st
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00182.html (9,115 bytes)

24. Re: Matt's question on Street tires (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:34:14 -0500
So if we take out "R" tires and go to a "Street Tire" and keep the ST classes, we got a ??? Mess? Matt Murray
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00196.html (7,992 bytes)

25. Re: GH's Question on Street Tires for Stock (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:08:37 -0500
Forgive me for not following, but what class do you run? Matt Murray
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00205.html (8,982 bytes)

26. Re: GH's Question on Street Tires for Stock (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:10:06 -0500
Ford makes tires? I thought it was Firestone. Matt Murray
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00206.html (9,314 bytes)

27. Re: GH's Question on Street Tires for Stock (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:34:58 -0500
A quick search had Mark Andy in ESP last year. I was hoping it was an ST class. :^) But Mark is not running stock, with no perceivable "dog in this fight." Unless, Mark is running something *new* for
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00208.html (9,761 bytes)

28. Video of Sunday's Fort Myer's Tour course (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:41:41 -0500
Matt Murray [quote user="jaball77"] Here's a look at Sunday's course for those that weren't there. My ES Miata was on Azenis, http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8144739449591930889 [/quote] Gr
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00211.html (7,257 bytes)

29. Re: GH's Question on Street Tires for Stock (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:33:27 -0500
You automatically exclude the MINI-S, RX-8, S2000, and a few other (fun) cars with that $20k cap.
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00228.html (9,654 bytes)

30. Re: GH's Question on Street Tires for Stock (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:44:19 -0500
But you talk of choices, isn't there a Street Tire class or two to compete in? Were those taken away over the winter? Members requested a street tire class. They were given a few of them. But, now yo
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00229.html (10,116 bytes)

31. Re: Here we go: Street tires v R Tires (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:14:50 -0500
I know I am going to regret replying.... In the grand scheme, try this. Combine SM classes, ST classes, and SP classes. Yup some might even favor making the current stock classes a "steet tire" class
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00238.html (10,679 bytes)

32. Re: Cross-posting (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 07:46:43 -0500
Evolution School discussion list on Yahoo Groups: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/evolution-discussions SCCAForums.com http://sccaforums.com/forums/default.aspx The main thread about the event is here
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00242.html (7,895 bytes)

33. Re: Here we go: Street tires v R Tires (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:22:13 -0500
Not bad Charlie, but not quite valid either. When BFG and Yok offered their "sticky" products, the autocrossers didn't have to buy them, then. Competitors DID like them. An increase in demand told th
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00245.html (9,546 bytes)

34. Re: Here we go: Street tires v R Tires (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:31:14 -0500
You can keep the ST classes. They were put there for "street Tires." Which means R Tires can continue to have a place to play, too. I only advocate ST go away if you are willing to re-org SP, SM, ST,
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00249.html (7,702 bytes)

35. Re: GH's Question on Street Tires for Stock (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:36:33 -0500
So maybe ST is the problem, not R tires in Stock. Or the semantics. A Stock R, B Stock R, C Stock R, etc. come out of the current Stock classes. St can use A Stock, B Stock, C Stock, etc. Backs up my
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00250.html (8,863 bytes)

36. Re: [evolution-disc.] G-Levels in Turns (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:39:48 -0500
I just love it when Byron and John talk dirty. =8^O Matt Murray -- Original Message -- _____
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00260.html (7,728 bytes)

37. Re: Matt's question on Street tires (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:33:28 -0500
Ahhh, the key phrase: This sounds like some of the mix of stock classes. Gotta go wash the mud off now. :^) Matt Murray
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00272.html (9,445 bytes)

38. Re: Re:Olympic medal-winner is an autocrosser (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:59:31 -0500
Sure, after ice skaters/dancers autocross, bicyclists will start do it. :^) Matt Murray -- Original Message --
/html/autox/2006-02/msg00281.html (7,877 bytes)

39. Proofing the cover :^) (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:22:28 -0500
So the cover of the November 2005 Pylon has "'96 RTP index revised." Thank goodness this was caught in time. :^) Matt Murray
/html/autox/2006-01/msg00006.html (6,438 bytes)

40. Re: [evolution-disc.] MR-2 why always 1993? (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:08:04 -0500
Slightly different rear suspension geometry (I don't remember the numbers) and larger wheels (14" vs. 15") come to mind. The 1993 car is also a mid-year split. I think it was January or February of '
/html/autox/2006-01/msg00027.html (8,391 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu