Mail Archive Search: <+from:jhadler@rmi.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:jhadler@rmi.net: 280 ]

Total 280 documents matching your query.

121. Re: Cooling Intercoolers on Grid (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 16:05:48 -0700; Richard, the rules apply to cars while running on course. The CO2 idea was to be used while the car is parked in grid with an external cooling source. Just like spraying down your radiator or putting; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00837.html (9,532 bytes)
122. Re: Cooling Intercoolers on Grid (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 16:35:06 -0700; This is totally a semantics issue and I would consider a wennie protest if ever there was one. The Rules don't allow for water sprays in the grid to spray down tires or radiators. And we all know tha; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00844.html (9,423 bytes)
123. Re: Cooling Intercoolers on Grid (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 23:45:46 -0600; I think that cooling down any part of your car that gets hot between runs is perfectly legal. So long as you don't take that cooling device/method past the starting line and onto the course. Sure, wh; /html/autox/1999-08/msg00884.html (8,773 bytes)
124. Re: How do you reduce oversteer in a FWD car? (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 18:10:49 -0700; How about disconnecting that rear sway bar! It sounds like that's the only thing that would keep you of stock class anyway. And rest assured, that will reduce your oversteer. -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01079.html (9,424 bytes)
125. Re: Petition to amend SCCA bylaws (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 19:19:23 -0600; Many people don't realise this, but when they check those little boxes of "interest" on their membership renewal form, they're asking for their membership dues to be shared amoung all of the boxes se; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01286.html (9,295 bytes)
126. Re: Find a Balance Between #classes and #cars (long and windy) (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 15:25:23 -0700; Egads! If you can pull in 30 new members in your region alone than you should get a job at National! I'm being a little facetious here, but there exists the fact that bringing a large flux of new dri; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01393.html (12,944 bytes)
127. Re: Find a Balance Between #classes and #cars..... (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 17:51:50 -0700; And this says what? That DSP isn't a popular class in your region. That's all. The SEB is responsible for establishing the primary rules under which the club competes. However, it is entirely up to t; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01404.html (10,541 bytes)
128. Re: Reduced class structure: now CSP/DSP Civic question (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 13:34:49 -0700; I'm not entirely fluent on the vagaries of Civics. But the reason why alot of cars are classed together in SP is the update/backdate allowances. For the Civic, they're probably all basically a 1500cc; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01488.html (9,579 bytes)
129. Re: Reduced class structure: now CSP/DSP Civic question (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 14:08:18 -0700; No Doubt. The M's have a distinct advantage on Torque and HP, but all of that "ground hugging weight", as Bob likes to call it, can be a disadvantage too. The 2002 is definitely a lighter car. Howeve; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01493.html (9,652 bytes)
130. Re: PROPOSAL: Super Street Touring (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 15:18:14 -0700; I think a concern could also be the ego of the target audience. They'll go out there full well believing themselves to be the hottest around. And get their door blown off by a bone stock Neon. How hu; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00031.html (13,173 bytes)
131. Re: SST vs. STU (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 11:23:56 -0700; [snipage] I think that if we're trying to create a national level category, then we have to toss the emissions requirement. As Dennis said, a car registered in California is going to be seriously ham; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00066.html (9,551 bytes)
132. Re: SST vs. STU (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 20:14:45 -0600; Richard, We're not talking about daily drivers here. We're talking about complete engine transplants and turbo or supercharger add-ons. How many inspector stations in California (draconian smog laws,; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00087.html (11,035 bytes)
133. Re: Rules about air ducting (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 11:00:55 -0700; Funny you should ask. I had a clarification from the SEB last year on this very topic. You can duct air to your engine intake in any manner provided that you do not alter the factory bodywork in any; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00270.html (7,851 bytes)
134. Re: Classing changes (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 13:42:35 -0700; If anyone would care to look at the latest version of the proposed Street Prepared class restructuring in I think it was last month's Fastrack (or maybe two months ago), you'll see that the new SP cl; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00366.html (8,687 bytes)
135. Re: Classing changes (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 18:15:12 -0700; From what I've seen, it's not over or under classed in CSP. At least the M3. The smaller 3-series cars I think may be cars without a class right now, but the M3 is OK in CSP. I think it better fits t; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00383.html (8,744 bytes)
136. Re: Activities at Nationals (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 12:49:49 -0700; A "Snipe" hunt? This being Team.Net, are you sure you don't mean a "Sipe" hunt? Sorry there mark, I couldn't resist... :-) -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR '; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00475.html (7,020 bytes)
137. Re: STU Displacement Limit - An Idea (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:34:55 -0700; Yeah, and you just threw out alot of the european cars. But a 944 turbo still fits, 2.5L 4 banger. However, I can almost guarantee that 95% of the STU cars are going to be OHC. Rotaries, most commonl; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00612.html (9,373 bytes)
138. Re: STU Displacement Limit - An Idea (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 14:46:18 -0700; Sounds more reasonable. It allows the bigger bimmer motors up to the '95 M3. But the honker 3.2's aren't allowed. I think that's pretty good though. I would guess most of the target audience is likel; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00618.html (9,992 bytes)
139. Re: STU Displacement Limit - An Idea (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 14:49:51 -0700; That's a good point mark. It does seem that this is evolving into a class for cars that run over 1bar. The way it's laid out now, you kinda gotta have a blower or a turbo if you're going to compete.; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00619.html (8,918 bytes)
140. Re: STU Displacement Limit - An Idea (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 15:49:18 -0700; Heh, right. DSMers watch out. If I ever win the lottery, I'm comin' at ya with either a rotary powered AWD bullet, or a boomer quattro. :-) Until that day however.... Because the market for 4-seaters; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00623.html (9,336 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]