Mail Archive Search: <+from:gs96@sgi.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:gs96@sgi.net: 168 ]

Total 168 documents matching your query.

41. Re: What's wrong with this picture? (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:14:48 -0500; Matt, the Supra has a Torsen. SM is not an extension of Street Touring so the "no LSD" requirement doesn't apply. SM cars can have any differential that can be bolted in. Your contention that the 944; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00552.html (9,343 bytes)
42. Re: Street Mod exclusions, was: What's wrong with this picture? (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 15:02:00 -0500; The downside to letting potential overdogs in and then booting them if they're too fast is the investment that booted competitor made is largely wasted. Imagine if someone builds a turbocharged 968 C; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00554.html (9,157 bytes)
43. Re: 2001 Stock Class Proposal (score: 1): Author: "kent rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 19:42:39 -0400; Nice effort Rick. I'm, ah, "concerned" that the new Boxter S is #1 in S2 right out of the box. There was very little development time in that car as far as I know and it still beat some very evolved; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00394.html (8,407 bytes)
44. Re: 2001 Stock Class Proposal (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:47:26 -0400; The C5 will only get faster - the C4 is probably pretty close to maximally tweaked in Stock. I think the resurrection of BSP shows there is a very large "market" of C4s that'll come out if they have; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00415.html (10,398 bytes)
45. Re: GPS and Big Brother Hysteria (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:10:45 -0400; Way to suck up, Ray. I'll make sure you aren't mentioned in her report :-) Kent Rafferty -- for the General. She said during Impound at Natls we could write down the VINs of all the C5s in SS and she; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00673.html (7,788 bytes)
46. Re: Letter to SEB / ESP (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 11:06:24 -0400; I was pretty intimately involved in the "Supra in ESP" debate - IMO, the Supra in legal trim is a good fit for ESP. On paper, a Supra Turbo and an IRS Mustang Cobra are almost identical. The problem; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00963.html (10,794 bytes)
47. Re: STS Tire Rules (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:30:04 -0400; I agree with Mark here. STS has proved to be hugely popular and will probably be the most popular class in autocrossing if it isn't already. The tire issue is problematic but certainly shouldn't prev; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01052.html (8,850 bytes)
48. Re: Older ponycars in ESP (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:32:01 -0500; Riehle's 1970 Camaro still thumps ESP when it shows up. The thing is very fast. Not M3 fast, but fast :-) The old ponycars aren't dead yet in ESP, they just don't show up as often........ out of ESP,; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01250.html (7,608 bytes)
49. Re: GS BMWs - Which is best? (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 14:48:05 -0400; These all sound like good choices, with the 330Ci the unknown quantity - but I'd stick with the E30 M3. It was a decent AS car and I *think* Tunnell said his E30 M3 could be as fast as his E36 M3 on; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00710.html (8,100 bytes)
50. Re: (Long) Comments on Nationals/M3/ESP (skip to end for ESP conclusions) (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 15:40:29 -0400; I can suggest what NOT to do. If I try to drive conservative-and-clean, it typically turns out to be clean-and-dog slow and the run is wasted anyway. On the North course, I ran conservatively, but I; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00719.html (7,588 bytes)
51. Re: BSM/SM2 (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 09:07:54 -0400; I wonder how spread out the trophies were by marque in BSP, ASP, ESP, or even CSP? SM was a new class this year and many interested national level drivers were taking a "wait-and-see" approach to the; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00949.html (12,333 bytes)
52. Re: BSM/SM2 (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 09:00:59 -0400; I'm finding perception is a big part of it. Show up in your street car and find you're running against a tube-framed, gutted, slick-shod race car and that'll take the wind out of your sails quickly.; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00950.html (8,913 bytes)
53. Re: The Ultimate I-Class (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 11:13:27 -0400; That's a bit of a cheap shot Paul. Anyone who seriously looks at the SM rules and choices would not say the Talon is the class overdog - not even close. Think about RX3s with 13bs, Integra-powered Ci; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00970.html (8,782 bytes)
54. Re: BSM/SM2 (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 11:40:14 -0400; So that's why Karl's Camaro was so quick all year - he turbocharged it and added an independent rear. He's sneaky that way :-) Kent Rafferty trophy cars? They're all said: hey! Look! We did a that. Y; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00983.html (13,015 bytes)
55. Re: The Ultimate I-Class (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 12:03:00 -0400; I'd be all in favor of letting the 944s in. The 911 I'll have to sleep on. Kent Rafferty; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00989.html (8,418 bytes)
56. Re: BSM/SM2 (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 14:07:10 -0400; Based on Roger's criteria, we should eliminate the following classes: Street Prepared: DSP ASP, Prepared: BP, AP, FP, EP, DP Modified: DM, BM, EM, AM, FM Other: F125, SM That certainly will streamlin; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01010.html (9,361 bytes)
57. Re: Ladies classes (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 09:10:37 -0400; I can understand the need/desire for Ladies classes at the local/regional level. An option would be to offer one paxed Ladies class, or one paxed Stock Ladies and one paxed SP/P/M Ladies class (like; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01190.html (9,722 bytes)
58. Re: OSP email list (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 17:49:14 -0400; Just to clarify, I don't believe the current SM crowd is against an OSP class. The SM crowd is not actively campaigning for an OSP class since we're still trying to establish SM. Once SM is establish; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01264.html (8,213 bytes)
59. Re: OSP? Sure, why not! (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:20:56 -0400; Works for me. The hard part is killing the weak How about one year on probation where SCCA powers try to "fix" the class by modifying the rules, allowing new cars in, booting Daddio out, or whatever.; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01398.html (6,741 bytes)
60. Re: Fw: October Fastrack (score: 1): Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 09:39:10 -0400; Good job Loren - way to take Rick's lighthearted comment and jump all over it :-) What Rick meant to say was his wife always drives with two hands on the wheel of the family Econobox, and she never e; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01452.html (8,289 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]