- 41. Re: SM PAX (was: 2001 PAX Index - Sirota - go to work!) (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:02:25 EST
- AB Wrote "Aside from a cat, what makes the CSP cars illegal?"... Cat's aren't even illegal in SM! :D Have fun guys! Dave Schotz... http://www.sccaforums.com
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00362.html (7,416 bytes)
- 42. Re: SM PAX (was: 2001 PAX Index - Sirota - go to work!) (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:42:17 EST
- No...they don't...because StreetMod, accepts all rules from Street Prepared as well, and thus Cat's are not required. They are required for STS, and STR, but not SM. Hope that make sense, Dave Schotz
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00389.html (8,060 bytes)
- 43. Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?' (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:25:20 EST
- You guys... you are correct, but you are mistaken. Here is the problem... Street Mod rules clearly state (and I quote) "C. Street Modified The purpose of this class is to allow the maximum amount of
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00405.html (8,049 bytes)
- 44. Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?' (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:54:49 EST
- You guys... (Maybe Dennis can Clarify)... I don't have a 2000 rule book infront of me. But if My memory serves me correct, it says something to this effect under SM... "SM includes all mods listed pr
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00415.html (9,454 bytes)
- 45. Re: SM 'Street Legal?' Now: cats (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:23:09 EST
- I'm sorry... Mark, and Eric... you guys need to climb out from under that CAVE!! How many ESP cars have Cats? Is SCCA responsible for telling these 'Federal Offenders #1' That they need to trailer th
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00494.html (7,723 bytes)
- 46. Re: SM 'Street Legal?' Now: cats (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 21:11:23 EST
- Mark... what you aren't getting... is the cats are only the obvious offense in your mind... You are missing the point of the class... as well as I would challenge you to find a CARB certification for
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00523.html (9,705 bytes)
- 47. Re: SM 'Street Legal?' Now: cats (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 21:11:36 EST
- Mark... what you aren't getting... is the cats are only the obvious offense in your mind... You are missing the point of the class... as well as I would challenge you to find a CARB certification for
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00524.html (9,724 bytes)
- 48. RE: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?' (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:01:11 EST
- <<There's no reason that the SCCA should continue to promote the (erroneous) idea that to get good performance from a street car you must defeat the pollution controls. Whatever. Mark >> Mark... what
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00558.html (8,646 bytes)
- 49. Re: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?' (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 20:33:31 EST
- Jay wrote... <<Then we all agree that the more-restrictive-than-SP "street legal" wording should be removed from the SM rules. Glad you got it figured out. Jay >> Jay... No I don't see 'street legal'
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00582.html (8,063 bytes)
- 50. Re: PRO SOLO, Show of hands..... (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 18:01:32 EST
- I agree, Dave Schotz http://www.sccaforums.com
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00670.html (7,832 bytes)
- 51. PAGING AUDI S4 Individual... More within... (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 21:50:12 EST
- I accidentally deleted the email an individual sent me regarding advice for an S4. If you are reading this, please resend. And I will answer. Thanks! Dave Schotz
- /html/autox/2000-12/msg00298.html (6,383 bytes)
- 52. Looking for '98 National Results... (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 13:33:49 EST
- Try here Roger, http://www.scca.org/amateur/solo2/98nationals/index.html That should have what you need. Dave Schotz
- /html/autox/2000-12/msg00567.html (6,362 bytes)
- 53. Check Out New Auto-X Message Board! (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 14:25:15 EST
- Hey guys, check out the new SCCAForums.com, it is brand new, and looks to be focused to all types of SCCA sports classes! Check it out... www.sccaforums.com See ya there!
- /html/autox/2000-12/msg00980.html (7,560 bytes)
- 54. Re: Check Out New Auto-X Message Board! (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 00:18:42 EST
- Not a matter of affiliation, Team.net, is not affiliated either, and we all use this email list, to share info about SCCA classes. This is forum is designed with the same intentions, however easy to
- /html/autox/2000-12/msg01017.html (8,841 bytes)
- 55. RE: 2001 Stock Class Proposal (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:21:10 EDT
- Why are we making a class for C4's only? If we are going to remove a car that has more TQ, and better Gearing from it's current class... just to make room for the new and improved, why is this not do
- /html/autox/2000-10/msg00412.html (9,449 bytes)
- 56. RE: 2001 Stock Class Proposal (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:30:21 EDT
- The same C5 only took 5th at the Pro. Curt drove well... but in no way is there any past races that would show that the C4 & C5's are mis-classed. If anything the only car that could be deemed 'mis-c
- /html/autox/2000-10/msg00423.html (11,821 bytes)
- 57. Re: Letter to SEB / ESP (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:46:08 EDT
- Chris, what Sam (and many others) are saying, is that then take those times, and see where they would have finished in ASP, and BSP and CSP etc... They would not been as competitive as the M3. Person
- /html/autox/2000-10/msg00962.html (9,751 bytes)
- 58. Re: C5 weight (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:37:56 EST
- We weighed 4 C5's at Nationals. Curt Ormistons was the lightest, at 3011 lbs, then mine (which was a bone stock still on Runflat's 2000 Hardtop) weighed 3028, then the Z-06 at 3038, and then Stacey M
- /html/autox/2000-10/msg01271.html (6,906 bytes)
- 59. Re: Good luck? (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 11:52:29 EDT
- A buddy of mine tells me "Hit a Cone!" another friend says "Good Skill" to me. Dave Schotz << I got asked by friends today whether there's a good luck phrase for motorsports, akin to "break a leg!" f
- /html/autox/2000-09/msg00164.html (7,648 bytes)
- 60. Z06 Corvette and Nationals? (score: 1)
- Author: SVPViper@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2000 16:27:11 EDT
- Where would the Z06 Corvette be classed at National's? They are already hitting the streets, and I was wondering if they would fall under the non-classed car rule and go to SS? Thanks, Dave Schotz
- /html/autox/2000-08/msg00324.html (7,397 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu