Mail Archive Search: <+from:MBD96@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:MBD96@aol.com: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Conquest to GS to C Mod (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 08:11:30 EST; << But some of us actually like the challenge of trying to make a turd go There are plenty of turds available for C Mod too. I know, I bought one. The difference between stock and C Mod is the turd y; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00490.html (9,226 bytes)
22. Re: Conquest to GS to C Mod (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 08:11:37 EST; << How I should have phrased that, darned hindsight, was that it'd probably be easier to trophy with a "real" race car, like CM, as opposed to a production based Stock car with all of its lawyer insp; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00576.html (8,738 bytes)
23. Re: Conquest to GS to C Mod (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 12:26:01 EST; << To maybe help Eric extract the foot from the mouth... >> Eric, did you read what Mark wrote? I think Mark's giving you the chance to get out of this alive :-) Bruce (I'm amazed someone came to Eri; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00594.html (8,659 bytes)
24. Re: Conquest to GS to C Mod (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 20:07:48 EST; << Beware CM guys, this Squareheaded KnuckleDragger is nothing to toy with. We figure he's trying to sucker in a CM driver from outside Kansas City >> He can't drive my car ... Bruce (you need both f; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00671.html (8,439 bytes)
25. Re: Conquest to GS to C Mod (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 22:43:34 EST; << Are you coming over to play with us at the dragstrip on the 21st?? We'd love to have you and I'll guaran-damn-tee you you'll have great time!!! >> Drag strip? DRAG STRIIIIPPPP?????? Are you nuts?; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00676.html (8,235 bytes)
26. Re: Conquest to GS to C Mod (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 19:00:09 EST; << *AT* the dragstrip, my friend. Not *ON* it!!! The strip, itself, is off limits to us. But, their paddock area, where we autox, is 430 feet wide by 1420 feet long. >> Oh ... Bruce (I guess I jumped; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00693.html (7,859 bytes)
27. Re: Braided/Stainless lines in Stock Category (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 13:43:42 EST; << He was not penalized; and after the event the allowance was made a part of the rulebook. >> I recall that he was disqualified. Bruce (I'm not quite as old as Roger so my memory should be just a ta; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00844.html (6,852 bytes)
28. Re: What happened? (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Sat, 27 Nov 1999 09:35:29 EST; << I just realized I forgot the web address ... It's a simple download, register, and install. then say goodbye to that monthly Internet service charge.. Jeff Lloyd internet user since 1992, and have; /html/autox/1999-11/msg01122.html (6,807 bytes)
29. Re: ConeMashers at the Runoffs (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 18:24:23 EDT; << Sunbeam driver in GT-? Tom Patton won in his, >> Another autocrosser, albeit a few years more removed ... Bruce Dickey; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00607.html (6,707 bytes)
30. Re: Thanks to Ed and Gary Kramar (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 01:54:37 EDT; << Anyway, I'm still pumped up about this past weekend. I just need to figure out how to get the money to buy an F-Mod and trailer in time for next year. >> John ..., you neglected to include in your; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01476.html (7,488 bytes)
31. Re: Video camera for autox? (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 09:53:23 EDT; << The last one has a base plate that is .156 thick aluminum, the sides and top are .093 thick. Its "TIG", Heli-Arc welded. And secured to the roll hoop of the March S2000 using U-Bolts. Inside the b; /html/autox/1999-07/msg00254.html (8,218 bytes)
32. Re: Solo Vee - SEB (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 08:35:56 EST; << After hearing this, my gut reaction is to write a letter suggesting that the F500 be moved back into CM (dragging the F440 kicking and screaming along with it), and that the Solo Vee be moved to a; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00007.html (7,251 bytes)
33. Re: Solo Vee - SEB (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 20:07:22 EST; << With the F500 back in CM, we'd all see a lot more local competition, and could once again be a major force at Nationals. >> First, I don't understand the logic behind this statement. Why would it; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00059.html (7,868 bytes)
34. Re: Solo Vee - SEB (long) (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 05:20:25 EST; << The creation of this committee is a good idea and I see no problem with allowing the different heads. All I see with the creation of this committee is positive, with the possibility of more Vees s; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00082.html (7,127 bytes)
35. Re: Possible Nationals Site (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 19:26:11 EDT; << If that is what you consider a good site, how about the Texas Motor Speedway north of Ft Worth. We are having a Natl tour this weekend. Maybe we can get some pros and cons. If anything, it is a he; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00349.html (8,596 bytes)
36. Re: Texas, No Beer? (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 23:16:40 EDT; << Someone here in Kansas City told me that lots of places in Texas don't sell beer. >> I think the track is actually in a dry county. Just south of the track are most of the hotels, restaurants, gas; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00493.html (6,931 bytes)
37. Muskogee Event Site (was ProSolo Expo Cancelled) (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 08:01:06 EDT; << The loss is to those that would rather make Oklahoma jokes than to attend an event at one of the flattest, smoothest, and best concrete sites in the Midwest Division. >> As an event site I can't r; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00945.html (6,684 bytes)
38. Re: Tire wear issues (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 14:17:16 EDT; << If the SCCA had their act together, they could create consistent tire rules for club racing and solo alike. Tire companies would have only one set of rules to work to for all of SCCA. >> Well John; /html/autox/1999-04/msg01070.html (7,026 bytes)
39. Re: one of my favorite topics (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 08:48:18 EDT; << In the meantime, my proposal was not based at changing the the way that R tires have been for the last few years. It's designed to keep tire issues from getting out of hand, as I claim was the cas; /html/autox/1999-04/msg01165.html (8,871 bytes)
40. Re: The tire thing^n (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 18:21:29 EDT; << The SCCA members have looked into ways of policing tires in the past. It never happened, mainly because of complex proposals and ... ahem .. politics >> Having been involved in some of these 'comp; /html/autox/1999-04/msg01220.html (7,812 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]