Mail Archive Search: <+from:Jeff@WINCHELL.COM>

Results:

References: [ +from:Jeff@WINCHELL.COM: 275 ]

Total 275 documents matching your query.

121. BMW produced chase scene (score: 1): Author: jeff@winchell.com; Date: 30 Apr 2001 13:29:37 -0700; http://www.bmwfilms.com/site_layout/filmstream.asp?FilmID=1&Type=WM&size=large OK, so it's a 740i boat anchor vs. a cargo van, but I still give BMW major cool points for producing this short film. __; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00890.html (6,888 bytes)
122. Re: BMW produced chase scene (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>; Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 22:38:33 -0700; It's a shortcut to prevent you from having to fill out their survey. You can go http://ww.bmwfilms.com to get to the site, plus then you can choose other media formats (Real Audio, maybe Quicktime).; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00913.html (8,230 bytes)
123. Re: Some El Toro Pro results (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>; Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 20:00:39 -0800; Laura Molleker was second in L2 running in an SS class Z06?; /html/autox/2001-03/msg00684.html (8,587 bytes)
124. RE: SM/2 a go for 2001 (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>; Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:33:46 -0800; But how much weight can you legal shed from the car in SM? Put another way, anyone want to take on the Babbs in their previously AP-trim Lotus Elan with an SM2 car? Or the Porsche RSR that the Fordah; /html/autox/2001-03/msg00760.html (8,031 bytes)
125. Supra=Japanese Camaro? (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>; Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 15:36:21 -0800; I am curious about why these cars are considered similar to ponycars. Disclaimer: I don't want to discuss whether Supras should be in SM. Nor does this have anything to do with any other Solo II cla; /html/autox/2001-03/msg00859.html (8,301 bytes)
126. Re: Car trailer/tornado navagation system (score: 1): Author: jeff@winchell.com; Date: 3 Feb 2001 08:35:56 -0800; Think of it as a more selective earthquake.<s> For more details, see "Great Mobile Homes of Mississippi"... http://www.drbukk.com/gmhom/gmindex.html; /html/autox/2001-02/msg00090.html (8,292 bytes)
127. Re: Street Mod exclusions, was: What's wrong with this picture? (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 01:45:53 -0800; I think it's too early to restrict SM. As for Hondas being scared away, the top STOCK Honda at Nationals was faster than the winning SM car. With all the wild possibilities in power trains and bodies; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00003.html (7,716 bytes)
128. Stupid Car Tricks (score: 1): Author: jeff@winchell.com; Date: 1 Dec 2000 11:13:41 -0800; http://PonyCar.Net/Stupid_Car_Tricks.jpg This picture is real - not doctored in anyway - and was taken last week in Waldorf, MD by a Transportation Supervisor for a company that delivers building mat; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00043.html (7,771 bytes)
129. RE: Forwarded note (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:34:29 -0800; Perhaps he mixed in a mental picture of Nagler's car with yours. I remember the first time I saw that awesome car at the Seattle NT. It did look like a professional road racing car. Allen Murrell wri; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00087.html (8,066 bytes)
130. SM, AP and superchargers (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>; Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 11:53:18 -0800; I was wondering why superchargers are discouraged so much. In the prepared classes, people can achieve very high HP (i.e. CP and BP) without them. In SM, the weight and possibly the suspension of th; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00089.html (7,293 bytes)
131. Re: The Tao of SM Inclusion/Exclusion (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>; Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:15:16 -0800; Given the suspension and powertrain options available, I don't see why these cars would be uncompetitive. Also I think SM needs to beat stock class times, let alone the much faster cars in CP, befor; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00165.html (7,813 bytes)
132. Stock class restrictions (was WRX) (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>; Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 22:49:31 -0800; FWIW, the 95 Cobra R "racing license" rule wasn't really enforced, and it doesn't exist on the '00 Cobra R. The concept of a bone stock 95 Cobra R actually being competitive in any stock class inclu; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00255.html (7,134 bytes)
133. Re: Contributing to the SM Inclusion List (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>; Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 00:38:07 -0800; Or the $150K Shelby Series 1?.<s> Then again, when the list includes a Saleen SR and now, apparently the $425,000 the Saleen S7. I suppose since that road race 911 showed up in AP in '99, we shouldn'; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00344.html (8,753 bytes)
134. Re: SM inclusion list & ESP (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>; Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 10:16:15 -0800; In the short term, I'd expect to see uncompetitive ASP/BSP/CSP car models try to get into SM until the truly competive modified CSP cars come out to dominate SM. In the long term, I think the SCCA ne; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00419.html (7,511 bytes)
135. RE: Demographics Now (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>; Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 10:16:15 -0800; I came around to using different pads and rotors for Solo II vs Solo I. And apparently a full welded in roll cage will be allowed in Stock and SP next year. But when I looked at the SCCA's road raci; /html/autox/2000-12/msg00420.html (9,304 bytes)
136. Re: Letter to SEB / ESP (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>; Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 00:13:40 -0800; I may have not made this clear, but winning 1st place isn't the only acceptable objective for those who want to be competitive. A lot of people want to just trophy, maybe some want to just be in the; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00057.html (7,616 bytes)
137. RE: Letter to SEB / ESP (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>; Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 00:13:40 -0800; == And the people that don't like that, consider that when deciding if they'll move into non-stock classes. The amount of time people in SP, P and M classes put into their cars is so far beyond what; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00058.html (8,229 bytes)
138. Re: Letter to SEB / ESP (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@WINCHELL.COM>; Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:40:46 -0800; Before this year began, the SEB ruled the car should be moved because a fully developed car driven by an A driver couldn't be competitive in CSP. Now the year is over, and it has been PROVEN that the; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01159.html (8,586 bytes)
139. Re: Letter to SEB / ESP (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@WINCHELL.COM>; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:31:32 -0800; </color>>>Now the year is over, and it has been PROVEN that the M3 was driven <color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>>>faster than last year and would be competitive in CSP, the SEB (and all I'd apprec; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01236.html (10,097 bytes)
140. Older ponycars in ESP (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@WINCHELL.COM>; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:31:32 -0800; If you want to petition the SEB to move 60's ponycars out of ESP, I'll support it. Unfortunately, FSP is nearly as slow as ESP, and it may be the case that 60's ponycars wouldn't be competitive there; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01237.html (7,233 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]