Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*oil\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*oil\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. oil (score: 1): Author: Pasanville@aol.com; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 17:49:00 EST; ASK THE MANUFACTURE! I can't stress this enough. Most engines today do not require the "rules of yesterday" that applied to us as mere youngsters in auto shop class. The reason we use to change the; /html/alpines/2000-11/msg00278.html (6,986 bytes)
2. Re: oil (score: 1): Author: "J Arzt" <humber_snipe@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 09:31:46 -0600; Of course, bear in mind that manufacturers today have no reason to tell you what's BEST for your car - after all, they have a vested interest in selling you another new one in a couple of years! Main; /html/alpines/2000-11/msg00287.html (8,782 bytes)
3. Re: oil (score: 1): Author: rgibbs@pacbell.net; Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 11:22:43 -0800; Jon, This is another example of "unintended consequences". Congress passes laws mandidating a CAFE limit, which increases over the years. The intended consequence is lower fuel consumption. The unint; /html/alpines/2000-11/msg00290.html (8,601 bytes)
4. Re: oil (score: 1): Author: CANISDOG@aol.com; Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 20:50:34 EST; Jon Artz, Thanks, very good post! Paul Colorado; /html/alpines/2000-11/msg00293.html (6,422 bytes)
5. Re: oil (score: 1): Author: "J Arzt" <humber_snipe@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 09:20:56 -0600; Which rather enters into one of my pet peeves regarding pollution measurements - WHY do they measure exhaust emissions in part-per-million instead of parts-per-MILE???? Suppose you have an SUV (Stupi; /html/alpines/2000-11/msg00298.html (9,356 bytes)
6. Re: oil (score: 1): Author: GSTROM99@aol.com; Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 10:26:17 EST; Here here!!! But the people at the EPA don't seem to "get it". gary; /html/alpines/2000-11/msg00299.html (6,390 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]