- 1. Re: Commercial Messages - No More (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike" <74@tr6world.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 08:40:53 -0400
- Hello 6pack List subscribers, I will be brief and to the point. This list has rules that are established. These rules include no commercial messages from vendors. These rules have been broken repeate
- /html/6pack/2003-10/msg00256.html (7,892 bytes)
- 2. RE: Commercial Messages - No More (score: 1)
- Author: "Kronberg, Peter" <peter.kronberg@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:28:42 -0500
- OK. My 2 cents. Personally, I'm thankful for the exposure to vendors via the list. This forum is my primary source of new product info pertinent to Triumphscomplete with reviews! Please don't discou
- /html/6pack/2003-10/msg00260.html (7,005 bytes)
- 3. RE: Commercial Messages - No More (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:13:03 -0400 (EDT)
- seeing that everyone seems to want to chime in on this one, I'll give my opinion... Nah - nobody wants to know that. Can we _PLEASE_ stick to TR6 stuff and skip the bullshit? THANKS. rml -- Bob Lang
- /html/6pack/2003-10/msg00264.html (7,265 bytes)
- 4. Re: Commercial Messages - No More (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Di Iulio" <diiulio@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 20:48:17 -0600
- Man, this is a tough one! I know our moderator has laid down the law on this one quite clearly but I'm gonna post my 2 cents anyway. I respect Mike's right to do whatever he wants with this list if h
- /html/6pack/2003-10/msg00283.html (9,360 bytes)
- 5. Re: Commercial Messages - No More (score: 1)
- Author: GSFuqua1@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 02:33:10 EDT
- Tom, you get my vote for most diplomatic and well worded response. Thank you for posting your thoughts. I would add my voice to your message. Even the constitution of the US changes from time to time
- /html/6pack/2003-10/msg00288.html (6,991 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu