Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+Richard\s+Good\s+hubs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+Richard\s+Good\s+hubs\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [6pack] Richard Good hubs (score: 1): Author: Andrew Packard <apackard68@att.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:14:16 -0700; Anyone out there having good experience with Richard Good's rear hubs? I was thinking of upgrading to the hub unit only that then attaches to the stock splined insert via the u-joint. Andy CD6746L __; /html/6pack/2009-04/msg00139.html (6,263 bytes)
2. Re: [6pack] Richard Good hubs (score: 1): Author: "Bob Danielson" <75TR6@tr6.danielsonfamily.org>; Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:07:49 -0400; There's a few guys in the 6-Pack Forum that have either his upgraded hubs or his new CVJs that use that hub. I've got his CVJs and the installation was a perfect fit. You can see it here http://tr6.; /html/6pack/2009-04/msg00140.html (7,590 bytes)
3. Re: [6pack] Richard Good hubs (score: 1): Author: Andrew Packard <apackard68@att.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:52:51 -0700 (PDT); I understood his CVJ's to require some enlarging of the hole in the trailing arm. After reading your website, I'm going to go with the CVJ's. Thanks for documenting all that work! Andy _____________; /html/6pack/2009-04/msg00141.html (8,550 bytes)
4. Re: [6pack] Richard Good hubs (score: 1): Author: "Bob Danielson" <75TR6@tr6.danielsonfamily.org>; Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:46:17 -0400; What you're referring to are his original CVJs that did have some fit problems with the TA hub hole. He pulled those off of the market about a year ago and re-engineered them with new components tha; /html/6pack/2009-04/msg00142.html (9,075 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]