vintage-race
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: turbo vs. super

To: smithspeedway@yahoo.com, vintage-race@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: turbo vs. super
From: WSpohn4@aol.com
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 11:07:41 EST
In a message dated 12/24/01 7:36:21 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
smithspeedway@yahoo.com writes:


> A turbo relies on rpm's to build horsepower.  They do very little for off the
> line performance.  Also, the "turbo lag" can be a little disconcerting.  

Not quite true, although both were apparent in early turbos.

A properly sized turbo minimises lag to the point where it is almost 
unnoticeable. It usually  gives smooth boost from 2000 rpm or so. 

If you want the fastest standing starts, a turbo has to be wound up and the 
clutch slipped - hard on the poor clutch, but if you want to do it, there is 
no penalty in acceleration time.

Bill
(daily driver, 88 Fiero with 3.2 turbo, 300 bhp, 0-60 4.5 secs, 1/4 mile 
close to 13.0)

///  vintage-race@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or go to  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>