vintage-race
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Ford 1500

To: JWoesvra@aol.com, grant62@starpower.net
Subject: Re: Ford 1500
From: "Roger Sieling" <sarl45@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 09:03:54 -0500
Probably the reason you remember the 1340 being such a hand grenade was not 
because of its 3 main bearings, but more to do with the hollow "glass-ball", 
un-counterweighted iron crankshaft that engine used. A proper steel billet, 
counterweighted crank should solve that problem. Lots of older engines got 
by on 3 mains, for a long time and was a real improvement over only two main 
engines. The proper Ford Cosworth Formula Jr engine is a little shorter 
stroke version of the same engine.

Roger


>From: JWoesvra@aol.com
>Reply-To: JWoesvra@aol.com
>To: grant62@starpower.net
>CC: rccook16@voyager.net, vintage-race@autox.team.net,   
>team-thicko@autox.team.net
>Subject: Re: Ford 1500
>Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 09:54:59 EST
>
>In a message dated 12/30/00 4:12:56 PM Pacific Standard Time,
>grant62@starpower.net writes:
>
>  Lotus Super's with 1340cc dual Weber
>  > & 1498cc single Weber to run in Group 3 this year. The dual Weber 
>1498cc
>will
>  > still be Group 8.
>  >
>  > Jack Woehrle
>  > SVRA Technical Director
>
>  In case anyone gets the idea that a single Weber DCOE will be
>  worthwhile, I crewed on a Super  with a 1500/1-40 in 66 and 67. The
>  intake manifold is the worst the mind of man ever devised. It just
>  wouldn't produce any power.  Dual Webers on the 1500 didn't become SCCA
>  legal for another generation - into the 80's, I believe. The 1340 was a
>  hand grenade, because it had only 3 main bearings(1 liter block, I
>  believe).
>  Grant Reynolds >>
>
>Life gets tough if you want to play with the little dogs.
>
>jw

_________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>