vintage-race
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Vintage Race Dilemmas...

To: jim hayes <jeh@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Vintage Race Dilemmas...
From: Mike & Jaye Rosen <mra@sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 13:16:30 +0000
Jim has hit the nail on the head when he wrote:
 1) It must be safe and 2) It  must conform to the rulebook of its era. Cars 
not meeting 
these rules would  be excluded for safety reasons or forced run with a 2 foot 
high 
"lemon" on  the trunk until they are put in conformity with the rules of the 
era!
> Enuff soapboxing for today -
Here in Canada we can easily chart some of these things because tracks like 
Mosport 
have been in operation since a lot of our vintage cars were contemporary 
ones... the 
lap times are scary.  We have cars going so much faster than they ever went 
then... I 
know that fuel, track surface and head flowing etc. are all better but... whats 
the 
purpose of a Sprite like some in the midwest that really is just a silouhette 
race car - 
We are always fighting (up here) what is allowed in the States by some clubs 
vs. our 
own rule book i.e. we only allow bug eye Sprites with 948cc. They were never 
made 
with 1275s. We are always fighting losing members and racers to US clubs 
because 
some of our guys feel uncompetitive when they go south. 
Why not just go contemporary racing and get it over with. 1966 is 30 years gone 
and 
can't be replayed. A '59 Sprite will always be a '59 Sprite. If it was raced 
back then, it 
CAN'T have equipment or mods that existed later.
This whole thread begs the question of JUST WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF VINTAGE 
RACING and if gets so out of shape, why bother.  I really wish everyone who 
views this 
as either a cheaper way to go racing or an easier way to be a champ to just go 
racing 
some other place.
Now I can off my soapbox
Mike

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>