To: | Triumphs <triumphs@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TR] TR250 Air valves |
From: | Roger Elliott <elliottr@rmi.net> |
Date: | Sun, 17 Nov 2013 19:00:27 -0600 |
Delivered-to: | mharc@autox.team.net |
Delivered-to: | triumphs@autox.team.net |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=rmi.net; b=Vv79eH2SE2n2rOjd16pTrzW0mOyvMSmibXiiISkkUFLdcLQRyt/pB0jtjbYe1a1X; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 |
Hi, I got air valves (pistons) for my wife's TR250 strombergs that have adjustable needles as it runs rich at the moment. I put the new needles in the valves and replaced the old air valves with the new ones. The Tr250 sounded great with the old valves in place and horrible with the new ones. I was expecting to have to do some adjusting, but this was more than I expected. With the new air valves, the font carb pulled about 10 on my synchronizer and the back pulled about 15. I put the old valves back in and the front one pulled about 6.5 and the pack pulled 7./ The only thing I changed was the air valve/needle combination. Why would changing the the air valves cause so much difference? Thanks, Roger ** triumphs@autox.team.net ** Archive: http://www.team.net/archive |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TR] Dash Cover Adhesive, G.D. Huggins |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TR] TR250 Air valves, Geo Hahn |
Previous by Thread: | [TR] Dash Cover Adhesive, James Henningsen |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TR] TR250 Air valves, Geo Hahn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |