> It is unfortunate, but ...
> didn't some state bar old cars because of their emissons?
Not that I have heard of. The topic has come up, maybe even a few bills
introduced, but nothing substantial has passed. CA can't even pass a bill
to make old cars subject to smog inspection (against standards they should
reasonably be able to meet).
> Obama isn't thinking about this, is he?
Hard to say what he is thinking (there's a straight line for all you pundits
out there); but again I've not heard any mention of it. What he is trying
to do is both stiffen the fuel economy standards (aka greenhouse gas
emissions) for new cars; and allow states like California to set their own
standards.
(Soapbox alert) Seems to me that they are going about it all wrong. What we
ought to do is classify anything over 5 ft high as a "truck", and limit them
to driving 55 in the right hand lane.
Or better yet, take the European approach, and tax gasoline up to about
$8/gallon. That would do WONDERS for our foreign oil consumption (which is
what Obama is really trying to reduce). Might help the deficit, too.
(Disclaimer: the above opinions void where not prohibited)
Randall
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
This list supported in part by the Vintage Triumph Register
http://www.vtr.org
Triumphs@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs
http://www.team.net/archive
|