triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] starter or battery

To: <jimmuller@rcn.com>, <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [TR] starter or battery
From: "Mark Hooper" <mhooper@digiscreen.ca>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 09:59:48 -0400
Hi Jim:

I've converted to the bolt-on terminal sort of battery. Everything seems
tight. The battery is from 2001, so getting on. But still, it seems to have
gone from quite normal to nothing in 1/2 an hour with no seeming shorts or
breaks in the car electrics. I unplugged the charger and the battery alone
barely able to even chatter the solenoid, so the battery seems to be the
primary cultprit. I'm charging an old post unit to act as a comparison.

Of course, the batter is a lot easier to replace than the starter, especially
with a header installed.

Cheers,

Mark


________________________________

From: triumphs-bounces+mhooper=digiscreen.ca@autox.team.net on behalf of Jim
Muller
Sent: Sun 08/06/2008 9:47 AM
To: triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [TR] starter or battery



On 8 Jun 2008 at 9:25, Mark Hooper wrote:

> So I don't know whether the battery is toast, or the starter
> solenoid is doing something well known.

You have done the obvious and cleaned the batteyr terminals, right?
High resistance between the battery and solenoid would allow the
solenoid to close, but as soon as the starter starts to draw too much
current the voltage at the solenoid would be reduced by that
resistance.  This could immediately cause the solenoid to open.



--
Jim Muller
jimmuller@rcn.com
'80 Spitfire, '70 GT6+
_______________________________________________

Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html

This list supported in part by the Vintage Triumph Register
http://www.vtr.org


Triumphs@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs


http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>