To: | <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: >>The earlier ring gear was pressed onto the flywheel (what an |
Date: | Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:30:58 -0500 |
References: | <s16e7d29.006@SMAIL.UMARYLAND.EDU> <ILEPINCMOPGADEKCHAMPMEPODJAA.mmarr@nexant.com> |
Virtually all U.S. cars from the 1940's up to the automatic trans had shrink-ons, as do most construction and farm machines. My theory regarding why they went to bolt-on is that Standard didn't have machining capability to hold that large a diameter to the tolerance needed. Probably wrong, but that's my story and I'm stickin' to it. Check out the new British Cars Forum: http://www.team.net/the-local/tiki-view_forum.php?forumId=8 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: >>The earlier ring gear was pressed onto the flywheel (what an, Michael Marr |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: >>The earlier ring gear was pressed onto the flywheel (what an, Jack W. Drews |
Previous by Thread: | RE: >>The earlier ring gear was pressed onto the flywheel (what an, Michael Marr |
Next by Thread: | RE: >>The earlier ring gear was pressed onto the flywheel (what an, Jack W. Drews |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |