| To: | triumphs@autox.team.net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: roto-roto-rotoflex? |
| From: | Chris Kantarjiev <cak@dimebank.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Sep 2003 12:08:13 -0700 (PDT) |
I vote that it's a royal PITA. The issue, at least on my car, is that there is a decent amount of negative camber (I may well have a re-arched spring), so you have to push the upper end of the vertical in a moderate amount to get it all to line up. We have, at times, required the special tool as well as three men and a boy to poke and prod and weight the car. I can't believe that it *needs* to be this hard, but that's how it is on my car. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: roto-roto-rotoflex?, Joe Curry |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Cv joints vs.rotoflex?, Steven McCutcheon |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: roto-roto-rotoflex?, Joe Curry |
| Next by Thread: | Re: roto-roto-rotoflex?, ZinkZ10C |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |