triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: gt6 vs spit trans

To: bill@rarebits4classics.co.uk, geo@ohio.net, triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: gt6 vs spit trans
From: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:25:03 EDT
From: geo <geo@ohio.net>

>good day...question? is a spit overdrive trans and gt6 overdrive trans the
>same except for the bell housing? can i switch the bell housing and put a
>spit trans in the gt6? thanks geo

>From Bill:

> No - the GT6 input shaft is longer. There are also internal differences
> which make the GT6 unit more robust, but the mainshaft length is the
physical
> restriction,

Aside from that, the ratios tend to be very different. It might be one thing
to use a GT6 gearset in a Spitfire, but I'd think it would be most
unsatisfactory to use a Spitfire gearset in a GT6. Keep in mind that the
traditional
"racing" gearbox for the Spitfire, as per the Competition Prep. Manual, used a
Vitesse 6/Sports 6 gearset -- effectively giving you a close-ratio gearbox.
Those
ratios are a lot closer to GT6-spec. than they are to Spitfire, and they
helped get rid of the "stump puller first gear" and the gap between second and
third. MkIV and later Spitfire gearboxes had a slightly lower (numerically)
first
gear because of the increased torque of the bigger engines but still not
nearly as low as the GT6 gearbox.

Compare the ratios at: <http://www.vtr.org/maintain/gearbox-ratios.html>

--Andy Mace

*Mrs Irrelevant: Oh, is it a jet?
*Man: Well, no ... It's not so much of a jet, it's more your, er,
 Triumph Herald engine with wings.
   -- Cut-price Airlines Sketch, Monty Python's Flying Circus (22)

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>